|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, September 04, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
BMP loses Rs. 30 cr. in land deal
By Anil Sastry
BANGALORE, SEPT. 3. At a time when the Bangalore Mahanagara
Palike (BMP) is reeling under a financial crisis, it has lost
around Rs. 30 crores by selling its share of prime commercial
property in the heart of the City to a builder and developer.
On November 29, 1995, the BMP entered into an agreement with
Shyamaraju and Company Pvt. Ltd. for developing 88,660 sq.ft. of
land (No. 61) near Akkithimmanahally tank bed at the junction of
O'Shaugnessey Road and Langford Road in the heart of the City.
According to the agreement, the builder was to develop the land
by constructing a building with two basement floors, ground floor
and three floors. In return, he was entitled to 60 per cent of
``undivided right'' to the land and the building, while the BMP
was entitled to the remainder.
On November 24, 2000, the BMP sold its interests in the land and
the building, named ``Divyashree Chambers'', which has an area of
1,92,235.3 sq.ft., to the builder, for Rs. 25,87,78,460.
On June 15, 2001, the builder entered into an agreement to sell
40.47 per cent of the land and the building to the Housing
Development Finance Corporation Ltd., (HDFC) for Rs.
55,07,86,256.
It is learnt that a formal ``deed of sale'' is yet to be executed
by the builder in favour of the HDFC as the arbitration
proceedings initiated by the BMP, demanding an additional Rs. 5
crores from the builder, are under way. The BMP has not issued an
occupancy certificate for the part of the property held by it
earlier.
Gross deviation: The original FAR proposed in the sanctioned plan
was 1,54,639 sq.ft., with two basement floors, ground floor and
three floors. The builder approached the BMP seeking permission
to build four more floors. The Administrator, in August 1996, did
not grant permission as that would have amounted to deviation
from the sanctioned plan to an extent of more than 200 per cent.
The building bylaws specify that a deviation of more than five
per cent from a sanctioned plan cannot be permitted.
However, the Government, in an order on December 12, 1996,
permitted the builder to construct four more floors. While doing
so, the Government took into consideration the land surrounding
the property -- 9.25 acres -- which belongs to the BMP (the
hockey stadium and playgrounds are situated on the land), for
calculating the FAR. Apparently, this was to limit the deviation
to under five per cent, it is learnt.
The Government Order restrained the BMP from constructing a
building on the land adjacent to the commercial complex.
HC order: On July 1, 1998, the Karnataka High Court struck down a
Government Circular dated June 14, 1996, allowing regularisation
of deviation of nearly 25 per cent from the sanctioned plan. The
court ruled that a circular could not be issued to override the
building bylaws.
As the sale of the building cannot be revoked, the perception in
BMP circles is that the builder should be made to pay penalty for
FAR based on 9.25 acres. If this is done, the BMP can limit its
loss to an extent, they feel.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Govt. will place facts before Cauvery Committee: Patil Next : Cong. may avoid issue in Council | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|