|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, September 09, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Next
Compromise on Palestine, slavery reached at Durban
DURBAN, SEPT. 8. The World Conference against Racism (WCAR)
adopted a declaration on Saturday recognising the injustice of
slavery and colonialism and the ``plight'' of Palestinians, after
nine days of contentious debate and brinkmanship that repeatedly
threatened to unravel the gathering.
Compromises on both issues were reached only on Saturday morning,
a day after the WCAR had been scheduled to end. Even as they
accepted the compromise, Arab States registered their
reservations that the conference would not directly condemn
Israel for its treatment of Palestinians. After the conference
declaration and programme of action were adopted, Australia and
Canada said they were unhappy with final documents' language on
the West Asia conflict.
Earlier in the day, the South African Foreign Minister, Ms.
Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma, told the conference she understood there
was agreement reached on the two issues, and the Islamic States
issued a statement confirming that. But several Muslim countries
then objected to efforts to delete additional text that many
delegates felt indirectly referred to Palestinians, including a
paragraph that said, ``Foreign occupation... is among the forms
and sources of racial discrimination.''
`A crime against humanity'
The WCAR acknowledged that slavery was a crime against humanity
and ``always should have been so.'' It also expressed an apology
in the form of acknowledgment for the wrongs of slavery and
colonialism and offered a package of economic assistance to
Africa. ``We are happy we found a solution,'' Mr. Hans Winkler,
an Austrian delegate, said.
It remained unclear what the new language would mean for European
fears of potential lawsuits seeking reparations, though several
European delegates said on condition of anonymity that their
fears had been addressed. ``It's certainly an issue that warrants
further exploration,'' said Mr. Wade Henderson, a lawyer and
executive director of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights,
a U.S. organisation.
Negotiators from the European Union and African nations reached
the agreement on reparations and the ``crime against humanity''
language about 4 a.m. local time, said South Africa's Minister of
Public Service, Ms. Geraldine Fraser-Moleketi. They had reached
an agreement on Friday to a compromise calling on those
responsible for slavery to find ways to restore the dignity of
victims.
A copy of the compromise text said, ``Slavery and the slave trade
are a crime against humanity and always should have been so. The
world conference, aware of the moral obligation on the part of
all concerned States, calls on these States to take appropriate
and effective measures to halt and reverse the lasting
consequences of those practices.''
Reparations, which were not directly linked to the slave trade in
the document, would take the form of debt relief, opening of
markets and poverty-eradication efforts. ``Africa had a
rendezvous with history,'' said Ms. Amina Mohamed, the Kenyan
mediator in the talks. ``We have an agreement on a document that
is far from satisfactory, is terribly imperfect, but that
provides a basis to build on, and I think, for the first time,
the dignity of the black man has been recognised.''
Arab States unhappy
The deal on West Asia was based on a South African compromise
accepted on Thursday by the E.U., but initially rejected by Arab
States. The proposal recognised the Holocaust and condemned anti-
Semitism and Islamophobia and also expressed concern ``about the
plight of the Palestinian people under foreign occupation.'' It
did not specifically criticise Israel or mention Zionism.
The Arab States had called for the WCAR to condemn Israeli
practices as racist. The E.U. had refused to allow it to take
sides in the conflict. While the documents are not legally
binding, countries promise to abide by the pledges.
Islamic States said they had accepted the compromise, but still
had serious reservations with its failure to address the
Palestinian issue. ``Despite the fact that the text expresses
concern about the plight of the Palestinian people under foreign
occupation, it failed to condemn the discriminatory policies and
practices of Israel,'' said a statement by the Organisation of
Islamic Conference.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Next : Caste finds no mention | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|