|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, September 09, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
The foreign hand
LONDON, New York, Singapore - Indian serials are discovering
fresh pastures to base their cloying family dramas in. So you
have the red-haired actor who played Ajit Sir in "Saans" striding
along a sylvan English mead on his daily constitutional, and then
making up for it a little later at a mithai shop in Southall.
Back at home his clan is gathering for a wedding, and awaiting
the arrival of a young uncle who announces airily over a
transatlantic call, I am in the US of A, my love. The rooms are
readied, planes land, and sundry taojis, baojis, and chachus
descend on the unsuspecting English landscape.
The arriving brood of relatives unveils a surprise: a blushing
young thing in pink. No idea who she is , but matchmaking is in
the air in "Sansaar". Sunday evenings at 9.00 p.m. on the new
Zee .
In "Deewane to Deewane hai", there is tension because the young
man in an unspecified foreign land with pater and mater, has
suddenly decided that his heart is in music, as is made in India.
His mother, wearing a collar of pearls with her muted chiffon
Punjabi suit, is horrified. "Kaise karega India mein," (How will
he manage in India), she shrieks, adding in English, "It is a
jungle out there." But junior is adamant. He will go back to
India. "Sarhadein" is set in Singapore, and "Dollar Bahu", as the
name suggests, in both India and the U.S..
Non-resident Indian themes are the latest hot thing on
television, saas-bahu dramas are passe. The protagonists are
global Indians, mostly young, adept at both touching their elders
feet and chasing dollars. (Literally. "Dollar Bahu" opens with
the central character chasing a fluttering dollar bill on a New
York street.) And if any Anglo-Saxons, Blacks or Caucasians also
live in these lands which our telegenic NRIs inhabit, the camera
does not register them.
Zee's new chief executive evidently believes in excess as a
market strategy. His 26 new programmes are awash with pretty
young things of both sexes, many of them prancing around in
foreign climes.
His explanation is that viewers now expect the same kind of
entertainment from TV that they get from films: music, foreign
locales and fresh faced heroines. The new Zee is determinedly
youthful: it is personified by the young Khushi, who smiles
winsomely through the Zee promo. And a lot of its serials have
young protagonists, notably "Koi Apna Sa" from Balaji Telefilms,
a somewhat overdone tale of three girls who are fast friends and
end up marrying into the same family.
The dollar bahu has not made her entry as yet in the serial of
that name. The home-grown one though is a lovely fresh-faced
find. Sudha Narayanmurthy's Kannada tale is among the more
promising offerings from the new crop. It opens with a minor
tragedy: the male protagonist returns triumphantly with green
card in hand, only to discover that the girl he has been waiting
to marry is now his younger brother's bride. The girl is equally
stunned. (Evidently, nobody has heard of photographs over here: a
son gets married and no pictures are sent to the older brother
abroad? A girl enters the family and encounters no photographs at
all of the elder son in the family?) But the serial has good
casting, and the Manhattan skyline to boot. Thursdays and Fridays
at 10.30 p.m. on Zee.
* * *
Last Sunday, Doordarshan unveiled a new initiative in showcasing
public service broadcasting with a 10.30 p.m. weekly slot on DD-1
which will present every week specially commissioned
documentaries. These have been funded by the Public Service
Broadcasting Trust which is a joint initiative between
Doordarshan and the Ford Foundation, run by film maker Rajiv
Mehrotra who is its only commissioning editor. Doordarshan will
put Rs. 1.25 crores into the venture each year, and expect 52
films in return to be shown on its network. The Ford Foundation
puts in twice that sum to help finance the same films.
The first film shown last week was praiseworthy because, frankly,
it is one of the few in the new crop of films which will appeal
to a wider segment of Doordarshan's audience, and which actually
briskly presents a subject of enormous interest to ordinary
people in this country. Called "Accounts and Accountability", it
is an account of Aruna Roy's right to information movement in
Rajasthan, well made. The trouble is that it is in English, and
DD being DD started the film well after the slotted time. If they
are cavalier about the time, only those who actually make these
documentaries will hang around waiting for them to start each
Sunday. Others will move on to other fare on other channels.
To coincide with the telecast of this new series called the "Open
Frame", a festival of these films was held in Delhi. Having seen
10 of them, I have to say that they seem to be conforming to the
original charter - that of making documentaries for an informed
audience. That is, however, a charter that needs to be
questioned. Documentaries alone do not make up public service
broadcasting in this country, particularly when they are in
English. And how presumptuous to say that they should be for an
informed audience. Why not for everybody?
There are two separate problems in this country. There is a
dearth of what is known as public service broadcasting and there
is a dearth of avenues for the number of talented documentary
film makers India has. However, better not to attempt to kill
both those birds with the same stone, because then only the
latter's purpose will be served. The documentaries that have been
produced in the first phase of PSBTs productions vary greatly in
style, subject and approach. There was a very interesting one
called "Tirupati: a Karmic debt", on what happens to the hair
people offer at Tirupati. This too should have been in Hindi,
with English subtitles. Other interesting ones looked at women
film directors and editors, single parenting, sexual harassment
of women at the workplace and indigenous religions in Arunachal
Pradesh. Some of them adopted a cinema verite style which becomes
tiresome after a while.
Apparently, the first lot of documentaries had to be in one of
the following areas: public culture, hidden knowledge and
transforming events. Who sets such esoteric agendas? If DD is
giving a substantial amount of money and a Sunday time slot, it
should prod the powers that be at PSBT to look at formats other
than documentaries, such as public service spots and telefilms,
talents other than the arty documentary makers known to the Delhi
circuit, and languages other than English.
PSBT has an impressive board with Shyam Benegal, Mrinal Sen,
Adoor Gopalkrishnan, Sharmila Tagore, and Kiran Karnik on it. I
think their board has a crying need for one popular film or TV
director from Mumbai with his or her finger on the popular pulse.
Because at the moment, it is a terribly clubby exercise.
SEVANTI NINAN
E-mail the writer at sevantininan@vsnl.com
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Favouring the English writer Next : Rabri Devi revisited | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|