|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, September 11, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Varsities Bill: Governor seeks clarifications
By Our Special Correspondent
BANGALORE, SEPT. 10. The Governor, Ms. V.S. Rama Devi, is
reported to have sought some clarifications from the Government
with regard to the Karnataka State Universities Bill, 2000 passed
by the two Houses of the Legislature.
The Bill, as passed by the Legislature, was vetted by a joint
select committee of the two Houses. It was referred to the
Governor, a former Union Law Secretary, for her assent.
The Minister of State for Higher Education, Dr. G. Parameshwar,
said here today that he was not aware of the details sought by
the Governor. His comments were sought on reports in a section of
the press that the Governor had returned the Bill exercising her
authority under Article 200 of the Constitution. He added that
the Advocate-General, Mr. A.N. Jayaram, would clarify the points
raised by the Governor.
The Law and Parliamentary Affairs Minister, Mr. D.B. Chandre
Gowda, had been quoted by a television channel as confirming the
Governor's action with regard to the Bill. He is away in
Chikmagalur District and was not available for comment.
Under Article 200, the Governor can give his/her assent, withhold
assent or return any Bill to the Legislature with a message to
reconsider it. Under Article 201, the Governor can reserve any
Bill for the assent of the President of India.
There are hardly any precedents in Karnataka or erstwhile Mysore
of the Governor returning a Bill. However, there are several
cases of the holder of the office seeking clarifications. Some
time ago, the Governor had sought clarifications on the Bill on
reservation for rural candidates.
The Leader of the Opposition in the Legislative Council, Mr. K.H.
Srinivasa, told presspersons today that the Governor had done the
right thing with regard to the Bill. That was what the Opposition
parties wanted her to do. He told the Government to reconsider
the Bill.
To a question, Mr. Srinivasa denied that the Opposition members
had complimented the minister concerned, Dr. Parameshwar, in the
Council. It was only in the Assembly that the Opposition had
praised him. The Opposition had gone hammer and tongs against the
Bill in the Council, though in the end they allowed its adoption.
Mr. Srinivasa noted that the Bill had no answer to ticklish
issues which might arise in the working of the Bill, for
instance, when the Governor and the Government failed to agree on
the choice of a vice-chancellor. There was no solution to such a
deadlock in the Bill.
The Karnataka State Universities Bill, which is an omnibus one,
says, among other things, that the Chancellor must appoint the
vice-chancellors with the concurrence (not mere consultation) of
the Government, and abolishes elections to the university bodies.
It also seeks to abolish the university senates.
In 1983, the then Governor had reserved the State's Comprehensive
Education Bill for the assent of the President of India. The
President gave his assent after a long time.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Govt. employees dupe MSIL of Rs. 3.5 cr. Next : Focus on heritage and environment | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|