|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, September 11, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Next
Pious hopes and prejudices
THE WORLD CONFERENCE against Racism has run a tortuous course in
a haze of controversies. A silver lining is the soft declaration
of high principles and the related plan of routine action.
Official India has heaved a sigh of relief too after facing
anxious moments over a spirited but unsuccessful effort by some
non-governmental agencies to place on the international agenda a
politically sensitive question of alleged discrimination against
the Dalits. From the beginning though, the U.N.-sponsored
conference in Durban, which concluded during the week-end after
an extended day's session, was rocked mainly by a fierce
political row over Israel's presumptive racist policies against
the Arabs. Equally lethal was a historically delayed clash over
the ethical and economic consequences of the medieval-era slavery
that the West imposed on hapless African captives. These issues
were resolved for the immediate purposes of the conference by
professional diplomats with a flourish of semantics. However, the
countries directly concerned either with the implications of
Israel's national psyche or with the lingering legacies of past
slavery have remained unsatisfied. The United States led a
campaign against the perceived bid by the Arab and Muslim
countries to arraign the Jewish state in a forum which, in
Washington's view, should have been concerned only with generic
issues and not individual nations. As the chorus of arguments and
counter-arguments reached a crescendo, the U.S. and Israel
withdrew from the Durban meeting itself. Inevitably, the walkout
raised the overall stakes in a forum dealing with all forms of
discrimination and xenophobia.
The U.S.' allies and the Arab-Islamic bloc wrangled till the end
and agreed upon a passage that did not blame Israel by name.
While most Arab states were content with a declaration cognisant
of the ``plight'' of the Palestinians under ``foreign
occupation'', Iran as also Syria and Pakistan expressed varying
degrees of dissatisfaction over the arguable inadequacy of this
formulation. At the other end of the spectrum, Canada and
Australia voiced reservations about the exclusive reference to a
specific case, although the two participated in the negotiations
to hammer out a compromise. The relative significance of present-
day slavery-like practices and the period-specific wrongs of the
original `sins' of the West also taxed the ingenuity of the
delegates. With the historical slavery being recognised in the
final documents as a notional but unjusticiable crime against
humanity, the West appears to have insulated itself from possible
legal claims for reparation. While it is debatable whether the
U.S.' pull-out served any purpose of inducing the anti-West
lobbies to adopt a less strident stand on issues of concern to
Washington, the fact remains that the Durban conference was long
on rhetoric and short on substance.
Nonetheless, there is also merit in the contentions of the U.N.
Secretary-General, Mr. Kofi Annan, and the Human Rights
Commissioner, Ms. Mary Robinson, that a conference declaration of
principles is better than none at all. The idea is to discourage
the worst elements in each society even if it is going to take
time to combat them. A committee under the U.N. auspices may be
set up to monitor the Durban follow-up. It is in this larger
context that many diverse issues of interest to specific sections
of the global community were raised in Durban. Of direct interest
to India was the social status of the Dalits, whose
representatives certainly put the issue of their alleged plight
in prime focus within the public opinion circuits on the
sidelines of the official conference. Somewhat alarmed at this,
India's official delegation faced the challenge without spoiling
its copybook but also without great finesse. The real question
was not so much the constitutional privileges of the Dalits as
their sense of fulfilment. The efforts within India at addressing
this must be reinvigorated.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Next : A little big film | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|