|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, September 13, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Science & Tech
| Previous
| Next
Nobel centennial and diabetes
THE NOBEL Prize is 100 years old. The Nobel foundation has
announced the Centennial celebrations, to be held in Stockholm
and Oslo, beginning from the 1st of December 2001 and culminating
on 10th December when the year 2001 laureates receive their
prizes.
In the context of the centennial, the awards connected with
diabetes need special mention. The important one was the 1923
prize for Medicine and Physiology awarded to Dr. Frederick Grant
Banting (1891-1941) and Dr. John James Richard Macleod (1876-
1935) for the discovery of insulin. The other prize was the 1947
prize to Dr.Carl Ferdinand Cori (1896-1984), Dr. Gerty Theresa
nee Radnitz Cori (1896-1957) and Dr. Bernardo Alberto Houssay
(1887-1971) for their discovery of course of catalytic conversion
of Glycogen.
The 1923 prize to Banting and Macleod was probably the only
occasion in the last 100 years of Nobel prizes, when the prize
was given the year after the discovery. It is probably by
providence that such a thing happened.
Choice of Dr. Banting and Dr. Macleod for the prize has been
debated, as there was no recognition given to Dr. Charles Best.
To explain this omission we should go back a few years earlier to
1920 when the Danish scientist 'Dr. Schack August Steenberg
Krogh' (1874-1949) won the Nobel Prize for Medicine and
Physiology for discovering capillary motor regulating mechanism.
Dr.SAS Krogh was considered one of Denmark's greatest biologists
next only to Niels Stensen and was considered a versatile genius.
He became very famous after winning the prize and of course
influential. Dr.Krogh's wife Marie Krogh, who was a physician and
research colleague, developed maturity onset diabetes in 1921.
She was diagnosed and treated with a special diet by another
physician by the name of Hans Christian Hagedorn. In 1922,
Dr.Krogh and his wife travelled to U.S. for scientific reasons.
While dining with the famous American diabetologist Dr. Eliot P.
Joslin, Dr. Marie Krogh came to know that a research group in
Toronto had isolated insulin.
This news prompted them to visit Toronto where they stayed as
guests of Dr. John Macleod in November 1922. After familiarizing
with the discovery of insulin Dr. Krogh returned to Denmark with
the licence to manufacture insulin in December 1922. Within 3
months, a diabetic patient was treated with insulin in Denmark.
Dr. August Krogh together with Hans Christian Hagedorn
established the Nordic Insulin laboratory that became the
starting point of the Danish Pharmaceutical Company `Novo
Nordisk'. Dr. Marie Krogh was treated with insulin until she died
in 1943 from a breast cancer. Their children did not know that
she had diabetes.
Dr. August in his letter to his friend Dr. Gran Liljestrand (who
was secretary of the Nobel committee during 1918-1960) of the
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences mentions the following (as
translated from Danish):`` As you understand from my discourse it
is my opinion that the discovery of insulin is of extraordinary
importance, both theoretical and practical and it will hardly
surprise you that I intend to submit a nomination that the Nobel
Prize be awarded to Dr. Banting and Professor Macleod".
In his nomination letter, Dr. Krogh writes,`` With the
information which I have personally obtained from Toronto, and
which also, although less clearly so, emerges from the published
works, one may conclude that the credit for the idea behind the
work which led to the discovery, undoubtedly goes to Banting, who
is a young and apparently very talented man. However he would
definitely not have been able to carry out the investigations,
which from the start and during all stages, have been supervised
by Professor Macleod." G.W. Crile of Cleveland and F.G. Benedict
of Boston also nominated Dr. Banting, in addition to Dr. Krogh,
for the Nobel Prize in 1923. G.N. Stuart of Cleveland also
nominated Dr. Macleod, in addition to Dr. Krogh, in 1923. Charles
Best was not nominated in 1923 and hence he was not included for
the consideration of the prize.
It is a custom with the Nobel committee that only nominated
candidates are considered for the prize. Even though Dr. Banting
shared his money from the Nobel Prize with Dr.Best, it can never
be considered the same as getting awarded. Prof. John Sjqvist and
Prof. Hans Christian Jacobaeus of the Karolinska Institute
provided written evaluations of Banting and Macleod's
contributions to the Nobel committee.
Prof. Sjqvist came to the same conclusion as Dr. Krogh that the
prize should be divided between Banting and Macleod. However,
Prof. Jacobaeus wrote,``Dr. Banting, who undoubtedly was the
first to have the idea and who has carried out the
investigations, should be the one who in the first place is
awarded the prize. On the other hand, it is difficult to evaluate
Macleod's contribution. It is not apparent from the literature.
Macleod, who is the head of the department in Toronto, has
previously carried out investigations on blood sugar. Banting
came to Macleod with his idea and purified insulin under the
direction of Macleod. ``I have been told that it is very likely,
that the discovery would never have been made if Macleod had not
guided him, at least not as early as it turned out. It has even
been declared that Banting planned experiments that would not
have been successful unless corrected by Macleod. On the basis of
what has been said I am most inclined that Banting and Macleod
jointly receive the Nobel Prize".
The influence of the nomination by Dr. Krogh on Dr. Liljestrand
(who was the chairman of the Nobel committee at that time) can be
assumed to be heavy as Dr. Krogh a Nobel laureate himself has
seen the works of Banting and Macleod all by himself.
On speculation, the visit of Dr. Krogh to Toronto was actually
prompted by his wife's diagnosis of diabetes. Had she not
developed diabetes and had she not sat next to Dr. Eliot Joslin
during dinner in Boston they might not have visited Toronto at
all. Banting and Macleod might not have got the prize in 1923 but
some years later and Charles Best would have been included in the
nomination. Several others also deserved the prize for the
discovery related to diabetes mellitus and they include James
Collip, Nicolas C. Paulescu, Joseph von Mering and Oskar
Minkowski.
In fact, James Collip and Charles Best were nominated for the
Nobel Prize in the year 1928 and 1950 respectively, von Mering
was nominated in 1902 and 1906, Minkowski was nominated in 1902,
1906, 1912, 1914 as well as 1924 and 1925. None of these
individuals were nominated for the prize in 1923 when Banting and
Macleod were nominated.
Interestingly, Paulescu was never nominated for the prize at all.
Has the Nobel committee waited for some more years before giving
the prize for the discovery on insulin, one of these scientists
would have got the prize too.
Again in the history of the Nobel Prize, more than three persons
never shared the prize. On December 10, 1923 Prof. J. Sjkvist of
the Karolinska Institute gave the presentation speech during the
Nobel Prize award ceremony. But both Macleod and Banting could
not attend the award ceremony and the prize was handed over to
the British minister by His Majesty the King to be given to the
laureates. It is customary that the prizewinners give Nobel
lectures on 8th of December at the Karolinska Institute and this
did not happen in 1923, as both Banting and Macleod did not come!
C.B.Sanjeevi
Karolinska Institute, Stockholm.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Science & Tech Previous : Question Corner Next : Clash of cryptography and copyright | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|