|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, September 21, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Next
U.S. must have world view on terrorism: BJP
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, SEPT. 20. The Bharatiya Janata Party president, Mr.
Jana Krishnamurthi, today said that if the U.S. was at all
serious about fighting terrorism, it would ``have to recognise''
that other countries have been facing the problem.
At the same time, he made it clear that there was no question of
the Centre or his party depending on the current focus on
terrorism to help them resolve the problem created by cross-
border terrorism in Kashmir. India had been dealing with the
Kashmir problem and he was sure `` we will have to resolve the
problem ourselves.''
He said the U.S. had talked about a ``long war'' against
terrorism, and a war against all those who harbour terrorism, and
there was ``no reason to mistrust'' them. Moreover, it had
assured New Delhi that no bargains will be struck with Pakistan
affecting Indian interests.
Although Mr. Krishnamurthi tried to rationalise U.S. seeking
Islamabad's help to fight terrorism because of the geographical
location of Pakistan on the border of Afghanistan, by saying that
the U.S. may have its ``own reasons,'' he indirectly questioned
the use of Pakistan as a front runner in the fight against
terrorism.
The Taliban and the Pakistan establishment had been hand in glove
in unleashing terrorism on India and nearly 40 per cent of the
Taliban militia were believed to be Pakistanis, he said. Over the
decade, as many as 53,000 innocent lives had been lost in
terrorist violence. Every human life was precious, ``be it Indian
or American'' and this world view must be kept in mind in any
global fight against terrorism.
India was definitely for a global war against terrorism, he said.
But, he was not willing to be drawn into responses on specific
questions related to India allowing American bases to be set up
here for there was ``no specific demand.'' If and when such a
question were to arise, ``this country, this Government and the
party will not compromise national interest,'' he added. What had
radically changed after the September 11 attacks on the U.S. was
the fact that while earlier no one was willing to listen to
India's voice against the dangers of terrorism, now world
attention was on it. It had been rudely brought home to Americans
that despite the ``pucca'' security arrangements, their country
too was ``not invincible.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Next : India and U.S.-Pak. ties | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|