|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, September 23, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
The brazen face of terror: Faceless enemy
Though well-entrenched and adequately funded, the fundamentalist
terrorist machine can be contained, says BHARAT VERMA.
THE fulcrum of the pan-Islamic terrorism against Kafirs is
located in Pakistan and Afghanistan. The Jehad Factory run by the
Taliban and the Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) of Pakistan
recruits volunteers from all Islamic nations and Muslim
populations settled in the West.
The financial contributions to run this Islamic Army of Terror
are primarily received from three sources. First, worldwide
donations from individuals. Second, an annual estimated income of
$12 billion that accrues from the narcotics and drugs trade to
Afghanistan and Pakistan. This is the single critical factor,
which has disallowed the collapse of Pakistan's wobbling economy
so far. Third, Saudi oil money provides a major subsidy.
Jehad contradicts the sovereignty based on defined territoriality
of a nation state. It is an interventionist ideology that divides
the world between Dar-ul-Islam (Muslim majority) and Dar-ul-Harb
(non-Muslim majority area to be converted to Muslim majority).
Footloose and faceless, Jehad warriors trained by the
Afghanistan-Pakistan combine and supported by fundamentalist
Islamic regimes have radiated outwards to Kashmir, Chechnya,
Dagestan, Bosnia and Xinjiang. The terrorist machine enjoys
extensive and well-entrenched networks in the subcontinent, West
Asia, Africa, Indonesia, Malaysia, the European Union and North
America. Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda (the base) boasts of
Pakistanis, Saudis, Egyptians, Yemenis, Jordanians, Iraqis and
Palestinians. Laden and his organisation form the spine of The
International Islamic Front which swears by destruction of three
countries, i.e., the United States, Israel and India. Though not
necessarily in that order.
In India, the agenda is not limited to Kashmir, which the front
wants to carve out as an Islamic state run on Wahabi philosophy
from Islamabad, but extends to West Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal,
Assam, Bihar and portions of South India. If the modus operandi
in the Kashmir Valley is based on ethnic cleansing, a demographic
alteration through creeping invasion is the happening strategy in
other parts of India. Subsequently using Assam as the launching
pad, the anti-kafirs movement will crawl towards the other States
of the Northeast just as it presently attempts to sneak in from
Kargil to less populated areas of Leh and Ladakh. Emboldened by
victory against the former Soviet Union in Afghanistan, the Jehad
machine is convinced that it has a low cost win-win weapon.
Therefore, its ambitions stand enlarged with two-fold politico-
military objectives. First, it wants to dominate the political
space in the subcontinent. Second, the aim of this pan -Islamic
movement is to capture resource-rich Central Asia through the
spread of Jehad beyond Afghanistan.
Terrorism betrays no physical contours nor presents a face
against which conventional military superiority can hit and
prevail. This Army of Terror indulges in a shadow war without
laid out or structured military bases, a regular government or a
defined territory. Therefore, it retains the highest level of
element of surprise vis-a-vis the regular forces. The victims are
likely to learn of (where, when and how) the destruction caused
by a free-floating terrorist outfit after the incident alone. A
nation or its military-cum-intelligence machine can brainstorm
and prepare for a hundred different threat scenarios, but
invariably terrorism will strike with the hundred and first
variation as the Americans learnt to their cost on a brutal
Tuesday.
Fight the terrorist like a terrorist
To win the war against terrorism, America will need to
judiciously combine its technological prowess and military
superiority with countries that have experienced and trained
manpower in low intensity conflict. Operationally, this is a
manpower intensive task as human intelligence (HUMINT) will
deliver more for the buck than mere satellite imagery. Similarly,
to prevail upon the enemy, special forces will need to fight the
terrorist like a terrorist. This again calls for deployment of
large human resources scarce in the U.S.. The capture of Osama
the individual may provide good sound bites but the danger comes
from Osama bin Laden as a motivation to thousands of Islamic
terrorists. The direction of war waged should aim to deconstruct
this lethal mindset.
The countries that can assist America are India and Russia, the
latter for the influence it commands and intelligence operations
it can conduct. China will neither interfere nor extend help due
to close links with Pakistan and the Taliban. However, the key to
this war remains in thinking like a (or ahead of the) terrorist.
Infiltrating his networks, denying fuel and food supplies,
causing rifts, creating suspicions between groups, extending
support to dissent, disrupting communications, by taking the war
into the enemy heartland and inflicting destruction which raises
the cost and launching of the psychological warfare.
American action in the aftermath of September 11 is a recent
example of the conduct of psywar. While the U.S. marshals its
resources, it has, through calibrated statements, put on notice
the Islamic fundamentalist outfits. Even before "Noble Eagle" is
operative, relationships between Afghanistan and Pakistan stand
ruptured and the groundswell against the Musharaff regime is
snowballing into a fireball. The enemy is in disarray.
It is difficult for America and its allies to simultaneously
focus military-cum-intelligence attention to demolish the large
terrorist network girdling the globe at one go. The counter
strategy, therefore, ought to hinge on going for the jugular.
Destruction of the Jehad Factory in our backyard will effect a
setback by at least 25 years.
Hence America and its allies should carry out clean surgical air
strikes over Afghanistan and induct troops to occupy strategic
high ground. Dismantle the terrorist networks and install a
liberal regime like the Northern Alliance. De-induct the ground
forces at an appropriate time. Bring to justice terrorists from
Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Security implications for India in the evolving matrix are no
worse or better than they were earlier. However, if New Delhi can
stiffen its political spine, put its military muscle where the
mouth is and activate a counter proxy war policy, it can succeed
in developing a strategic corridor to resource rich Central Asia.
Conversely, a nation that does not dare to wage a ruthless war
against terrorism can never win.
The writer is Editor, Indian Defence Review
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Root of the problem Next : The brazen face of terror: Bonded by a threat | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|