|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, September 25, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Fugitive terrorist issue to figure in talks
By Hasan Suroor
LONDON, SEPT. 24. The whereabouts of Imad Mughniyeh, suspected to
be an ally of Osama bin Laden and a key figure behind the
hijacking of an Indian Airlines plane to Kandahar in 1999, are
likely to figure in the British Foreign Secretary, Mr. Jack
Straw's talks with Iranian leaders during his visit to Teheran
which began today.
Mughniyeh, who is wanted for his alleged role in a number of
hijackings and attacks on Western targets, is believed to be
hiding in Iran, according to the British media, and Mr. Straw is
expected to raise the issue with the Iranian President, Mr.
Mohammad Khatami.
A Foreign Office spokesman told The Hindu that the British
Government was co-operating with a number of governments in
tracking down the criminals behind the terrorist attacks in
America but he declined to comment on details of individual
investigations.
Reports stressed that there was no suggestion that the Iranian
Government had any links with Mughniyeh or that indeed it was
even aware of his movements.
``President Khatami is not thought to have sufficient influence
with those sheltering Mughniyeh to persuade them to hand him
over, presuming that he has not already left,'' The Times said.
It said he was believed to have met some ``key lieutenants'' of
Bin Laden in recent months, and quoted intelligence sources as
saying that the use of pocket knives and scissors by the
hijackers of American planes on September 11 seemed to suggest
Mughniyeh's involvement.
``The evidence shows that Mughniyeh has been involved in
hijackings since the early Eighties. What we want to know now is
how many of those he used in these operations could have been
employed again (for the September 11 atrocities in New York and
Washington),'' a source told The Times.
Officially, however, the issue was not being talked up and Mr.
Straw in his remarks, before leaving for Teheran, chose to
emphasise Iran's ``contribution'' to the current U.S.-led
international campaign against terrorism.
As the first British Foreign Secretary to visit Iran in more than
20 years, he was careful not to say anything that could be
misconstrued by his hosts.
Britain, which has emerged as a key player in Washington's bid to
forge a worldwide coalition against terrorists, regards Iran's
willingness to come on board as a significant development at a
time when there is considerable scepticism in the Muslim world
about Western aims.
Mr. Straw emphasised that Iran's most ``important contribution''
was that by coming out publicly against the Taliban for
sheltering Bin Laden it had demonstrated ``very vocally that this
is not a fight with Islam''.
Many Muslim countries, he said, had been victims of the Taliban's
excesses and Iran was one of them.
Iran has ruled out permitting its airspace or bases to be used
for strikes against Afghanistan but its willingness to support
the political objectives of the U.S.- driven coalition is seen
here as a triumph for British diplomacy.
Washington does not have diplomatic relations with Iran and much
of the groundwork for softening Teheran was done by London with
the Prime Minister, Mr. Tony Blair taking the initiative to call
up Mr. Khatami.
There was speculation on how far Mr. Straw would go in pursuing
the Mughniyeh issue, or indeed in what form he would do it.
There were suggestions that the matter might come up in the
course of Mr. Straw briefing Mr. Khatami on British intelligence
``suspicions'' about Mughniyeh. Observers were confident that the
issue would not ``sour'' the visit.
Meanwhile, the Liberal Democrats today opposed giving blanket
support to American retaliation plans.
The party leader, Mr. Charles Kennedy, speaking at the opening of
his party's annual conference in Bournemouth, said while
terrorism had got to be brought to a ``halt'' it did not mean
``you start giving out blank cheques''.
He also objected to the ``war rhetoric'' saying: ``War is not the
word; nor is crusade.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : W. Asia truce talks called off Next : Use the U.N. in fight against terrorism: Annan | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|