|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, September 25, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
CPP for cellular mobile services
THE TELECOM Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has prepared a
consultation paper on issues relating to the introduction of
Calling Party Pays (CPP) for incoming calls to cellular mobile
services. This consultation paper is also available on their
website. The paper discusses at length the advantages and
disadvantages of the CPP plan along with the technical and
financial implications and mentions the countries that have
adopted or rejected this plan.
The TRAI is in the process of consulting the stakeholders on
whether the CPP plan should be implemented and if so, should it
be optional or mandatory. While this exercise has been made
possible due to a recent amendment in the TRAI Act, what remains
a mystery is the sudden re-introduction of this proposal. The
TRAI had actually passed this order in 1999 but the Order and the
Regulation were challenged in the Delhi High Court. What is also
not clear is whether TRAI has really perceived that there is a
demand for this scheme from subscribers and has therefore placed
this issue for discussion before the public.
What is CPP?
CPP refers to the system of providing free incoming calls to the
cellular mobile subscriber from a fixed network, as the calling
party will pay. At present the basic telephone subscriber pays
the same charge of Rs. 1.20 for three minutes whether he calls
another basic telephone subscriber on a fixed network or a mobile
subscriber.
According to the CPP scheme the cellular subscriber need not pay
for the mobile leg of the call from the basic subscriber. The
basic telephone subscriber will have to pay a different tariff
(much more than the present) when a call is made from a fixed
network to a mobile subscriber. The mobile subscriber will under
this plan not need to check who the caller is.
The growth of cellular mobile services has been phenomenal in
India despite the high tariff structure. Mobile subscribers have
accepted the terms and conditions offered by cellular mobile
operators. Today, tariff and service charges have become
competitive and are much more affordable to many consumers.
Cellular service providers have in many cases provided free
incoming calls to their subscribers. With the introduction of CPP
considerable investment in the form of technical infrastructure
would have to be provided for monitoring these calls and billing
procedures. Logically, infrastructural costs will definitely be
passed on to the consumer. When the calling party pays for calls
made from the fixed telephone to a mobile subscriber tariffs are
to be set and decisions are to be made on the amount of revenue
to be shared by both the fixed and mobile networks. Calls made
from PCOs would also pose a problem while setting tariffs for the
CPP plan. Also basic telephone subscribers would most certainly
get confused on prevailing CPP tariff rates due to the difference
in rates levied by the mobile operators.
Undoubtedly the only beneficiary of this scheme would be the
cellular operator who is ensured of a guaranteed fixed income.
The most affected would be the basic subscriber who has to pay a
higher tariff for such calls. A majority of the basic telephone
subscribers are not aware of CPP and the complex matrix of issues
involved. For more than 80 per cent of the basic telephone
subscribers in India the telephone is a necessity, more for
receiving calls than making them. Any hike in tariff whether it
is for calls or rent has a deep impact on this section.
Considering the above-mentioned facts the plan could be deferred
until such time as market forces finally prevail on the
introduction of CPP.
As a regulator, the main task of TRAI remains that of providing a
level playing field for the service providers keeping in mind the
interests of consumers at large. All those who are interested in
presenting their views can send in their comments to TRAI, as the
process of consultation is still open.
SHOBHA IYER
Coordinator, Citizen consumer and civic Action Group (CAG)
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Know your English Next : Memories of 'Manikodi' | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|