|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, September 27, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Doctoring of tapes denied
By J. Venkatesan
NEW DELHI, SEPT. 26. Mr. Pradip Krishen, film director engaged by
the Tehelka portal, today disputed before the Venkataswami
Commission the expert opinion given by Mr. Milind Kapoor that
there was a possibility that the portal's tapes could have been
doctored. Deposing before the Commission today as an expert
witness, Mr. Krishen said it was not possible to delete the sound
or video alone on the format used by the news portal. He said if
the sound had to be deleted, the corresponding video footage
should also be deleted.
Mr. Krishen thus differed with Mr. Kapoor who had said on Monday
that doctoring, deletion, interpolation, addition etc. was
possible without affecting the sound or the picture while editing
the tapes which he also demonstrated before the Commission. He
denied the charge of counsel for Ms. Jaya Jaitley that he was
deposing as an expert because of his alleged economic link with
the portal's CEO, Mr. Tarun Tejpal.
Counsel submitted that the book `God of Small Things' written by
his wife, Ms. Arundhati Roy, was published by `India Ink' company
in which Mr. Tejpal was a partner and that he was biased in
giving his opinion. Mr. Krishen, however, agreed with counsel
that there could be different opinions from two experts. When
counsel wanted to know whether it was advisable to refer the
unedited tapes for examination by a panel of ``neutral'' experts,
Mr. Krishen said ``you can get an unambiguous opinion on the
genuineness of the tapes, if they were examined by other
experts''.
He, however, said that no such expert was available in New Delhi
and if at all the tapes could be sent only to a technical
laboratory in the United States.
Mr. Umashankar, another expert on sound recording, also denied
the charges of ``doctoring'' of the tapes. He said there was no
break or cut in the sound recording which could suggest
``manipulation'' of the audio track. He said there was no
discontinuity or manipulation in the four frames shown by Mr.
Kapoor.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Global research needed for prediction Next : Wage board should be done away with: INS | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|