|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, September 27, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Court asks Jayalalithaa to appear on Oct. 10
By Our Special Correspondent
CHENNAI, SEPT. 26. With the examination of prosecution witnesses
ending in the `coal import deal case', the Special Court-II today
directed the former Chief Minister, Ms. Jayalalithaa, to appear
before the court on October 10 for questioning under Sec. 313 of
Cr.P.C.
The judge, Mr. S.S.P.Dharwesh, directed the former PWD Minister,
Mr. S. Kannappan (A-2 in the case), to appear for Sec. 313
questioning on October 9, and the other eight accused including
two former Chief Secretaries, Mr. T.V. Venkataraman and Mr. N.
Haribhaskar, to appear for questioning on October 8.
In all, the CB CID which investigated the import deal in which
the prosecution case is that the import had resulted in a Rs.
6.5-crore loss to the TNEB, 11 persons were cited as accused. One
of them, V.R. Nedunchezhian, died during the trial. Originally,
the special court framed charges in the case in June 1999 on
which occasion, it discharged Ms. Jayalalithaa from the case. On
appeal by the then Government, the Supreme Court directed re-
hearing in June 2000 by including Ms. Jayalalithaa's name again.
The trial began again in August 2000.
The examination of the prosecution witnesses ended today with Ms.
Jayalalithaa's counsel cross-examining the investigating officer.
The IO, Mr. M. Shoukat Ali, said his investigation did not reveal
the former Chief Minister's interference or recommendation in
finalising the tender in the tender process or in favour of any
supplier for the coal import.
The entire case against her was with regard to a letter she wrote
as Chief Minister to the Prime Minister and her signing the coal
import approval order. Earlier it was signed by the entire TNEB
Board, the then secretaries and Ministers for PWD and Finance.
Except these two acts, she had not played any other role. There
was no specific allegation of pecuniary advantage against her.
Till she approved the tenders, she was not informed of anything
with regard to the tender proceedings.
It was true that the supply of coal by M/s Coal India created
many problems, such as shortage of supply, irregular supply and
delay because of which the TNEB had to go for coal import. Such a
decision was taken only in public interest.
``My investigation revealed that because of the coal import there
was no power cut in Tamil Nadu,'' he said adding that the TNEB
was an autonomous institution, only which paid money for the coal
import and not the Government.''
The views expressed by the former PWD secretary, Mr. V. Sundaram,
were his internal correspondence prior to the taking of the
decisions. Finally, he agreed that the decisions taken were
correct, the IO added.
The import was only to create a buffer stock and not a supply on
regular basis. His investigation also revealed that Indian coal
was inferior in quality to coal imported from Indonesia and
Australia. Of the permitted 2 million tonnes of import only two
lakh tonnes were imported.
Till the interim chargesheet was filed, his investigation had not
revealed any specific allegations or unlawful activity on the
part of Ms. Jayalalithaa in the case, the IO claimed.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Talks in DMK front under way, amid pressures Next : Tuticorin engineer develops software for remote controlling | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|