|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, September 27, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
The creation called Osama
By Shamsul Islam
THE UNPRECEDENTED deaths and destruction in two cities of the
U.S. on September 11 has stirred the conscience of the world. It
was the most lethal, ruthless and daring terrorist strike on the
nerve centre of the world's most powerful nation today. The U.S.,
which promises to guarantee security to the world, was found
wanting in checking the terrorist strikes at home for more than
40 minutes when the terrorists had the free run of its major
airports, highjacking not one or two but four domestic planes to
be used as flying bombs.
It did not take long for the U.S. establishment to identify the
culprits who masterminded these terrorist acts. These were the
`evil' forces of `Islamic terrorism' led by Osama bin Laden. The
mainstream U.S. media went on to explain these terrorist attacks
in the context of the `clash of civilisations' thesis of Samuel
Huntington. There were urgent calls for ``forming a global
alliance that will use all tools - diplomatic, political,
economic, educational, investigative, and where appropriate,
force - to pursue and root out the terrorist criminals and their
supporters...''
But it is really surprising that the U.S., mecca of information
technology with its super computers and all kinds of data bases,
should be so greatly short of memory about Osama bin Laden. The
media in the U.S. these days is full of biographical sketches of
Osama bin Laden in which he appears on the world scene in 1990
opposing the Gulf War and then is shown growing into an anti-West
monster, finally, targeting the U.S. on `Black Tuesday'.
However, it may be news to many ears that Osama's journey as a
terrorist did not start in 1990-1991. Any honest biographical
description of Osama should not overlook his activities in the
1980s when he was deputed by the CIA to Afghanistan to finance
and oversee the resistance to the Soviets. He was groomed as a
theocratic-terrorist by the U.S. openly. In fact, there is lot of
weight in the thesis that the modern Jehadi-Islam is a byproduct
of intrigues by the West to keep the Islamic world under its
suzerainty, devoid of any kind of democratic processes. And also
to use it as a whipping boy occasionally whenever attention needs
to be diverted from issues raised by anti-globalisation
campaigners.
The Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA),
which has a long tradition of opposing the Taliban regime and
paying for it with blood, raised this issue in its September 14
press statement. While condemning the terrorist attack, the
statement went on to underline the fact that ``the people of
Afghanistan have nothing to do with Osama and his accomplices.
But unfortunately we must say that it was the Government of the
United States who supported Pakistani dictator Gen. Zia-ul-Haq in
creating thousands of religious schools from which the germs of
Taliban emerged. In the similar way, as is clear to all, Osama
has been the blue-eyed boy of the CIA''.
How the U.S. and the CIA created Osama and his network has been
well-documented in the book ``Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and
Fundamentalism in Central Asia'' by Ahmed Rashid who is the
Pakistan, Afghanistan and Central Asia correspondent for the Far
Eastern Economic Review and The Daily Telegraph of London. This
book which has been published by the Yale University Press
clearly shows who in reality created Osama. Ahmed Rashid in his
superb expose is able to present the factual linkages between the
U.S. and the `monster' which it created. Some of the excerpts are
too revealing too be missed.
``In 1986, CIA chief William Casey had stepped up the war against
the Soviet Union by taking three significant, but at that time
highly secret, measures. He had persuaded the U.S. Congress to
provide the Mujaheddin with American-made Stinger anti-aircraft
missiles to shoot down Soviet planes and provide U.S. advisers to
train the guerrillas. The CIA, Britain's MI6 and the ISI
(Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence) also agreed on a
provocative plan to launch guerrilla attacks into the Soviet
Socialist Republics of Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, the soft Muslim
underbelly of the Soviet state from where Soviet troops in
Afghanistan received their supplies. Casey was delighted with the
news, and on his next secret trip to Pakistan he crossed the
border into Afghanistan with President Zia to review the
Mujaheddin groups.
``Thirdly, Casey committed CIA support to a long-standing ISI
initiative to recruit radical Muslims from around the world to
come to Pakistan and fight with the Afghan Mujaheddin. Washington
wanted to demonstrate that the entire Muslim world was fighting
the Soviet Union alongside the Afghans and their American
benefactors.''
The book also goes on to show in graphic detail how harmless
madrassas were turned into factories for breeding religious
guerillas. ``... between 1982 and 1992, some 35,000 Muslim
radicals from 43 Islamic countries in the Middle East, North and
East Africa, Central Asia and the Far East would pass their
baptism under fire with the Afghan Mujaheddin. Tens of thousands
more foreign Muslim radicals came to study in the hundreds of new
madrassas that Zia's military government began to fund in
Pakistan and along the Afghan border. Eventually more than
100,000 Muslim radicals were to have direct contact with Pakistan
and Afghanistan and be influenced by the jihad...
``In camps near Peshawar and in Afghanistan, these radicals met
each other for the first time and studied, trained and fought
together. It was the first opportunity for most of them to learn
about Islamic movements in other countries, and they forged
tactical and ideological links that would serve them well in the
future. The camps became virtual universities for future Islamic
radicalism''.Interesting details of Osama's recruitment by the
CIA for jehad in Afghanistan are also available in this book.
``Among these thousands of foreign recruits was a young Saudi
student, Osama Bin Laden, the son of a Yemeni construction
magnate, Mohammed Bin Laden, who was a close friend of the late
King Faisal and whose company had become fabulously wealthy on
the contracts to renovate and expand the Holy Mosques of Mecca
and Medina. The ISI had long wanted Prince Turki Bin Faisal, the
head of Istakhbarat, the Saudi Intelligence Service, to provide a
Royal Prince to lead the Saudi contingent in order to show
Muslims the commitment of the Royal Family to the jehad. Only
poorer Saudis, students, taxi drivers and Bedouin tribesmen had
so far arrived to fight. But no pampered Saudi prince was ready
to rough it out in the Afghan mountains. Bin Laden, although not
a royal, was close enough to the royals and certainly wealthy
enough to lead the Saudi contingent so when Bin Laden decided to
join up, his family responded enthusiastically.
He first traveled to Peshawar in 1980 and met the Mujaheddin
leaders, returning frequently with Saudi donations for the cause
until 1982, when he decided to settle in Peshawar. In 1986, he
helped build the Khost tunnel complex, which the CIA was funding
as a major arms storage depot, training facility and medical
center for the Mujaheddin, deep under the mountains close to the
Pakistan border.''
The book also demolishes the CIA claim that after 1990 there were
no contacts with Osama. Surprisingly, just a few weeks before the
U.S. Embassy bombings in Africa, the book tells us, ``the Saudi
conundrum was even worse. In July 1998 Prince Turki had visited
Kandahar and a few weeks later 400 new pick-up trucks arrived in
Kandahar for the Taliban, still bearing their Dubai license
plates''.
This all shows that any meaningful fight back against world
terrorism today will have to begin from the backyard of the U.S.
(The writer is Reader, Department of Political Science, Satyawati
College, University of Delhi.)
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Return of realpolitik Next : America's wrong policies | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|