|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, September 28, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Builders hope for review of CMDA rules
By S.Shanker
CHENNAI, SEPT. 27. Builders in the suburban areas are hoping that
the CMDA would review the present rules following the
regularisation drive.
They point out that very few suburban localities have the
infrastructure or the necessary road width for construction of
multi-storeyed buildings.
The Chennai Suburban Builders Association president, Mr. G.
Mohan, citing Alandur as an example, say the road width of over
80 per cent of the town's 765 streets is 30 feet or less. This
leaves little scope for construction of multi-storeyed complexes
on a large scale.
Builders blame the deviations on the rules relating to `G plus
1'. There are very few buildings that conform to the rules. If
the number of dwellings is more than five, they would come under
the special buildings category, for which the set-back space
would have to be more than that stipulated for `G plus 1'.
The restriction on dwelling units appears to have forced the
builders to sub-divide large plots to circumvent and minimise the
extent of deviation and, more importantly, obtain plan sanction
from the local bodies. The sub-division permits kitchens in
multiples of four, depending on the number of plots. However,
each sub-divided plot should have provision for set-back space,
which reduces the total construction area.
In the case of plots whose length is over 60 feet, a 10-feet set-
back space would have to be provided in the rear. Builders
question the purpose of this stipulation, saying it would be
better if allowed in the front for parking.
No common compound wall is permitted for plots which are sub-
divided for increasing the number of dwelling units. Boundary
walls around multiple plots would result in the reclassification
of the building under group housing. In any case, set-back space
and sub-division do not allow builders to achieve the permitted
1.5 FSI.
More than the compulsions of the DCR, the builders say they would
have to factor in the marketability of the flats. With the middle
class people preferring suburban areas owing to financial
constraints, the general preference is for units costing not over
Rs.7.lakhs.
With a number of companies entering the housing finance business,
the buyers' potential for borrowing has increased. However, the
regularisation drive has left flat owners worrying about the
state of their homes, threatened by the clause relating to
demolition of building for violations.
At a recent meeting of the builders association, many members
said the most affected were their clients to whom they had sold
the flats.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Logistics exhibition gets underway Next : A station of record | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|