|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, September 28, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
We must be neither with the terrorists nor with the U.S.
By Sitaram Yechury
The initial war hysteria and bellicose rhetoric of the Bush
Administration is giving way to monotonous repetition of a ``long
and protracted war''. Apparently responding to the sentiments
expressed by a range of world leaders, including some of the
closest allies of the U.S., who asked for ``unquestionable
evidence'' before striking, the Bush Administration has promised
to release a White Paper detailing the role of Osama bin Laden
and his Al Qaeda. This was on September 23. Nothing concrete has
been made public so far.
The celebrated investigative journalist, Mr. Bob Woodward,
writing on the front page of the International Herald Tribune (24
September, 2001) alongwith Mr. Walter Pincus notes that despite
leads, investigators struggle to establish links with the
hijackers. The report states: ``The members of the Qaeda groups
in the United States were in some cases initially identified by
the Central Intelligence Agency through information gathered
abroad that connected specific individuals to Osama or the Qaeda
network. Under an agreement, the CIA passes this information to
the FBI, which then begins investigations and surveillance within
the U.S. Over the last two years, the CIA has provided the FBI
with approximately 100 names of people associated with the Qaeda
network who have entered the country legally in most cases. Over
the years, some of the Qaeda members and other identified
associates of terrorist groups in the U.S. have been subjects of
investigation, but their cases were closed because no crimes were
uncovered.''
This, surely, does not, in any manner, absolve the suspicion.
However, even without hard evidence being established, the U.S.
military machine has moved into the Persian Gulf and taken
positions. The U.S.'s principal cheer-leader, Britain, has also
pitched in with its submarines. This will surely lead to the
entrenchment of U.S. military presence in many new areas.
Utilising this opportunity, the U.S. is seeking to seal its total
control of this oil rich region.
In the meanwhile, in the so-called battle of democracies against
terrorism, the U.S. is busy trying to prop-up the Northern
Alliance, which is battling the Taliban in Afghanistan. Its
immediate agenda appears to be to replace the Taliban as the
Government in Afghanistan. The U.S. has indicated to bring back
the former Monarch, Zaheer Shah, who was overthrown in 1973 and a
pro-Soviet socialist government came into office. The ``battle of
democracies'' is to be won by restoring monarchy in Afghanistan!
It is such manoeuvres to advance U.S. strategic interests that
resulted in the creation of the Taliban in the first place. This,
in turn, became the breeding ground for professional terrorists.
How many such nurseries will the U.S. go on creating jeopardising
the lives of innocent millions?
Much is known of the U.S. military interventions during the
second half of the 20th century when civil liberties, human
rights, freedom and dignity of millions of people the world over
were trampled upon. During the last decade since the end of the
Cold War, U.S. hegemonic efforts intensified. Apart from its
known military interventions, it paid scant respect to
international opinion and agreements such as the Kyoto Protocol,
the United Nation's conference against racism, the attempt to
unilaterally abrogate the ABM Treaty etc.
Such hegemonic efforts went to the extent that five days prior to
these horrendous attacks in New York and Washington, the U.S.
House of Representatives passed what is known as `Vietnam Human
Rights Act'. This proposes to allocate $ 2 million for each year,
2002 and 2003, to ``provide assistance, through appropriate non-
governmental organisations, for the support of individuals and
organisations to promote human rights and non-violent democratic
change in Vietnam''. In simple language, this financial
assistance is for the overthrow of socialism in Vietnam.
The proposed Act requires the U.S. Secretary of the State to
report every six months to the U.S. Congress about ``efforts by
the United States Government to secure transmission sites for
Radio Free Asia in countries in close geographical proximity to
Vietnam''.
Elsewhere in Korea, the Bush Administration stopped negotiations
with North Korea unilaterally which had begun under an agreed
framework in 1994. This was necessary to declare North Korea as a
`rogue State' in order to justify the U.S. nuclear missile
defence programme. As a result, the ongoing process for the re-
unification of the North and South have virtually halted. The
U.S. supported right-wing forces in South Korea succeeded in
forcing the resignation of a Minister close to President, Mr. Kim
Dae Jung, on September 3.
Despite the official renewed declaration of ceasefire between
Israel and Palestinians on September 18, widely seen as a result
of U.S. efforts, Israel continues to mount aggression on
Palestinian territories. Between September 23 and 25, the
ceasefire has been breached 24 times by Israel leading to the
death of one person and critical injuries to 25, including two
children. That the U.S. turns a blind eye to such developments
speaks volumes of its real intentions.
Such U.S. efforts to interfere in and control all events across
the globe earn for it the notoriety of playing the role of
world's policeman. It would be a worse tragedy, if the U.S.
Administration seeks to utilise the September 11 human tragedy in
a cynical and a diabolic manner to strengthen its hegemonic
designs over the world. The U.S. attempts to use the death of
over 6,000 innocent lives to advance its global interests must be
resisted. The failure to do so will lead to greater human
tragedies.
In this context must be viewed the U.S. President, Mr. George W.
Bush's call to the world to be either with the U.S. or with the
terrorists. The answer must be given: we are neither with the
terrorists nor with the U.S. Administration.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Fort and garden Next : Russia gains concessions on Chechnya | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|