|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, September 29, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Next
Selective focus
THE CENTRE'S ACTION of clamping a ban on the Students Islamic
Movement of India, which has come under the adverse notice of
law-enforcing agencies over the past few years for its perceived
links with pan-Islamic extremist organisations and suspected
involvement in certain specific subversive episodes, would not be
called into serious question especially in the post-September 11
context of an all-out global `war' against terrorism. While the
demand for such a ban has been there for quite some time now from
States such as Congress-ruled Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh,
besides the BJP-led Government in Uttar Pradesh, the blatantly
provocative pro-Osama bin Laden campaign mounted by the SIMI
leadership has apparently impelled the Centre to outlaw the
radical group, a decision that does make sense, given that India
is a committed partner of the anti-terrorism alliance forged
worldwide. But the provocative and clearly sectarian manner in
which the Uttar Pradesh Government has handled the immediate
backlash to the ban and the police action resulting in the death
of at least three persons needs to be strongly condemned.
One cannot also but point to the biased approach of the Atal
Behari Vajpayee regime to the aggressive hate campaign that the
Sangh Parivar, mainly the Vishwa Hindu Parishad and the Bajrang
Dal, has been systematically running against the minorities and
the physical attacks its outfits have been carrying out on their
places of worship and institutions. In a sense, the arrogant
display of majoritarian exclusivism, as manifested in the whole
range of diabolical acts targeting the minorities and their
symbols - the demolition of the Babri Masjid, attacks on
Christian institutions in Dangs and the murder of Graham Staines
and his two young sons, to name just a few - contributed
substantially to the escalating aggression of the increasingly
insecure minorities and, by extension, to the religion-centric
militancy striking roots in the vulnerable segments of these
communities. The official establishment at the Centre, presided
over by the BJP, has invariably sought to exonerate the Sangh
Parivar elements or downplayed their role in hate crimes.
Contrast this with the zeal that it has shown in rushing to
declare the minorities as culprits where the hand of any of their
groups is suspected. Only five months ago, the Centre outlawed
another Islamic outfit, Deendar Anjuman, a Hyderabad-based
nondescript fringe organisation accused of engineering a series
of bomb blasts in churches in Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Goa
during May-July 2000, for having links with Pakistan and
indulging in anti-national activities.
The impression is unshakeable that the BJP-led coalition is
highly selective - and calculatedly so - in applying the
`unlawful activity' yardstick as between the Sangh Parivar
outfits and those belonging to the minority communities. The VHP
and the Bajrang Dal, apart from indulging in vicious propaganda
and distributing hate literature against the minorities, have
been conducting camps across the country where arms training is
given to their cadres and members of Durga Vahini, an outfit of
women, and there is nothing clandestine about it. It should not
be difficult to visualise the destructive potential of this
manifestly unlawful venture from the standpoint of public order
and communal harmony. The Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister, Mr.
Digvijay Singh, had, while seeking a ban on the SIMI, made out a
strong case for similar action against the likes of the Bajrang
Dal also. The Vajpayee Government cannot escape the charge of
double standards as long as it refuses to move decisively against
the Hindutva fundamentalist elements and, what more, the Prime
Minister's statement that the anti-terrorist campaign is not
Islam-specific will fail to carry conviction. Outfits like the
Bajrang Dal, whose provocative character and socially destructive
potential differ very little from those such as the SIMI must
also be banned.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Next : ''Auctioning'' of panchayats | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|