|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, September 30, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
U.N. clamps down on terrorist outfits
By Sridhar Krishnaswami
WASHINGTON, SEPT. 29. The U.N. Security Council acted with
unprecedented speed on Friday when it approved a U.S.-sponsored
resolution that mandates the 189 member nations to deny support
and sanctuary to terrorists and their networks. The legally
binding Resolution was adopted unanimously on Friday night.
The resolution forces member states to make ``wilful'' financing
of terrorism a criminal offence. It calls for the immediate
freezing of terrorists' funds and preventing movement of
individuals and groups suspected of having terrorist connections.
For now the focus of the resolution is on actions by member
states to come to terms with terrorism. The Council has not
threatened violators of sanctions, but the expectation is that
the Resolution will be fully implemented. The U.S. has said that
it will work hard to ensure that.
What must be especially gratifying to the Bush administration is
that the resolution was drafted, debated and passed unanimously
in just a day, a rare feature in the Council's workings. The
Republican Administration and other Western members were looking
for quick action before the General Assembly started a debate on
terrorism on Monday.
The new American Ambassador to the world body, Mr. John
Negroponte, called it an ``unprecedented resolution against
terrorism in the work of the United Nations''. The consensus
among the Western members is that aside from the resolution being
historic, there was this urgency by way of an increased danger to
international security.
It is significant that for the first time the world body has not
named any country or even a group of people. Rather the focus was
on an issue that has now come to challenge the international
community. The world body, through the resolution, is putting the
onus on nations to deny safe havens to terrorists.
Further, the Council has not got itself involved in the process
of defining who a ``terrorist'' is. The British Ambassador, Mr.
Jeremy Greenstock, while acknowledging that there may be
differences as to who is and who is not a terrorist remarked,
``... for most of the time, if something looks like a terrorist
and makes noise like a terrorist, it's a terrorist.''
Though there has been some apprehension over the fashion and
speed with which some in the Permanent Five sought to work on the
resolution, there is also the realisation that if nations were
looking for a ``comprehensive'' document, that would literally
take months. The accent was on the kind of international action
that was needed immediately.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : No foreign troops: Taliban Next : Crackdown on SIMI continues | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|