|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, September 30, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
Crackdown on SIMI continues
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, SEPT. 29. In the continuing nationwide crackdown on
the Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI), 122 activists were
arrested on the second day today, taking the total number of
arrests to 362.
Highly-placed sources in the Home Ministry said the maximum
number of arrests took place in the non-BJP ruled State of
Maharashtra, which topped the chart with 103. Forty-five persons
were arrested in West Bengal and Rajasthan. In Kerala, 31
activists were arrested, while in Tamil Nadu, the number was 20.
The number of arrests in Madhya Pradesh was 24. No one was
arrested in Bihar. And, in the BJP-ruled States of Uttar Pradesh
and Gujarat, there were 92 and eight arrests.
Sources said the activities of SIMI had been under ``close
watch'' for the past one year and the first move was made in
October last when the Union Cabinet was informed about SIMI being
on the watch-list. The ban being imposed in the aftermath of the
September 11 terrorist strikes in the U.S. was ``purely
coincidental.'' The entire material and evidence against the
organisation would be placed before a tribunal, comprising a
sitting judge of a High Court, to determine the validity of the
ban.
The Home Ministry's notification, declaring SIMI as an ``unlawful
association'', said the anti-national and militant postures of
SIMI were clearly manifest in the speeches of its leaders, who
glorified pan-Islamic fundamentalism, used derogatory language
for deities of other religions and exhorted the Muslims for
``jehad.''
`Ban has no communal overtones'
Meanwhile, the Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister, Mr. Rajnath Singh,
and three of his Ministers, called on the Prime Minister, Mr.
Atal Behari Vajpayee, and apprised him of the situation in the
State, particularly Lucknow, which witnessed riots following the
ban. Later, he told correspondents that the ban on SIMI did not
mean that a particular community was being targetted.
Another Minister, Mr. Lalji Tandon, blamed the Samajwadi Party
for the violence and charged that its activists had instigated
the attacks against police in Lucknow. He claimed that barring
the incident, there was neither sympathy nor support for SIMI.
Even Congress-ruled States like Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh
had endorsed the decision to ban activities of SIMI.
On the suggestion of the Congress Chief Ministers to impose a
similar ban on the Bajrang Dal, Mr. Tandon said there was no
comparison between SIMI and the Bajrang Dal. SIMI had links with
international terrorist organisations and if not checked, the
situation could become worse, he alleged.
Denying that the Centre had taken the decision with an eye on the
Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections, Mr. Tandon said national
interest was the only consideration.
The delegation, which also included the State Finance Minister,
Mr. Harish Chander Srivastava, and Mr. Hukum Singh, sought
financial assistance to implement various development programmes
in the State, held up due to the non-release of Central funds. It
asked the Centre to release Rs. 1800 crores for various schemes
and clear the foodgrains stock so that space could be created
before arrivals started in October. The Union Food and Civil
Supplies Minister, Mr. Shanta Kumar, is scheduled to visit
Lucknow on October 4, to attend to the problem.
The Union Finance Minister, Mr. Yashwant Sinha, and Mr. Shanta
Kumar were present during the meeting.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : U.N. clamps down on terrorist outfits Next : Opposition should have been consulted: Farooq | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|