|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, October 01, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Next
U.N. and the anti-terror focus
THE UNITED NATIONS Security Council has enthusiastically spelt
out a comprehensive framework of do's and don'ts to promote a
global-scale campaign to combat terrorism. The Council's latest
unanimous resolution is a virtual directive to all the U.N.
members on how they should tame the terrorists by starving them
of funds and assets and by denying safe havens to the actual and
potential perpetrators of terrorist crimes as also the sponsors
of such activities. Adopted under Chapter 7 of the U.N. Charter,
the resolution is enforceable in respect of all its
recommendations. Significant, therefore, is the constitution of a
monitoring committee. The Council's call for enhanced
international cooperation is suitably aimed at preventing the
spread of terrorism across state boundaries. Two other salient
features of the arguably historic resolution are no less
indicative of a new mood of multilateral determination to arrest
the politics of terror in the context of the recent terrorist
offensive against America. First, the U.N. members have been
asked to treat terrorist acts as criminal offences under their
respective national laws. Second, all countries are enjoined upon
to refrain from providing any form of support, active or passive,
to the financiers as also the actual and potential perpetrators
of the terrorist crimes. However, the moral force of the
resolution might make a materially positive difference to the
current international clamour for action against terrorism only
if a truly global consensus could be generated about the very
definitions of various forms of trans-border terrorism.
As the victim of the world's worst episode of terrorist strikes,
the United States took the initiative for the latest U.N.
Security Council resolution. The U.S. must therefore act, as far
as possible, in conformity with the parameters and principles
enunciated under all the relevant U.N. resolutions now and later.
The U.N. has, over time, considered various facets of
international terrorism, while the latest resolution marks a
definitive leap forward by the global organisation in addressing
the intricate web of connections between the terrorists and their
sponsors as also state-protectors. However, the many distortions
of the existing international political order may still act as a
constraint on the U.N.'s proactive impulses. Overall it is true
that the U.N. has not been particularly effective in promoting
multilateral coalitions to deal with issues of critical
importance to the world at large and not just the U.S. and the
other major powers. Yet, Washington can usefully interact with
the U.N. as a collective forum before preparing to track down
Osama bin Laden, the chief suspect behind the latest terrorist
outrage against the U.S., and before planning any other anti-
terror operations.
Even as Pakistan agreed to cooperate with the U.S. in its ongoing
efforts to get hold of Osama bin Laden and his suspected
terrorist network inside Afghanistan, Islamabad pointedly kept
the U.N. in focus as the moral authority for possible
multilateral operations in this regard. More specifically,
Pakistan drew attention to the resolution that the U.N. Security
Council had passed in the immediate context of the terrorist
attack on America on September 11. An avid non-official
interpretation in the West at the time was that Pakistan seemed
to suggest that the U.S. was already armed with the U.N.'s
authority to wage a war against the terrorists with a global
reach. Nonetheless, the relevant question now is how far the U.S.
will actually take the U.N. into confidence on intricate aspects
of Washington's strategic offensive against terrorism. While the
U.N. Security Council has had no difficulty in endorsing the U.S.
initiative at this stage, Washington too will do well to explore
the possibilities of forming a broad-based international
coalition against the politics of terrorism, conforming as much
as possible to the framework of a U.N.-led consensus.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Next : On the precipice | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|