|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, October 02, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Miscellaneous
| Previous
| Next
dated October 2, 1951: Sir C.P. on India and the U.S.
Sir C. P. Ramaswami Aiyar, who had reached New York en route to
San Francisco, met on the 30th September a group of American
intellectuals and journalists. Asked what was to be done to
improve Indo- American relations, he said the best way was not to
talk about it. Silent understanding would be more effective than
advertising differences. Contradicting the general impression
that there was much anti-American feeling in India, he said the
U.S. had to understand India properly. India had just become free
and was quite anxious to retain her freedom. A British historian
had observed that India was conquered in a spirit of British
absent-mindedness. Free India wanted to make sure that there was
not going to be such absent-mindedness on anybody' part again.
Asked if India would accept Communist doctrine, he replied it
could not, because the Indian was a rugged individualist. About
birth-control, he said it was prevalent in economically strong
advanced countries. Americans wished to restrict the size of
their families to maintain their high standard of living. If men
of goodwill brought about India's economic improvement and a high
standard of living, birth-control would automatically follow. Mr.
Aiyar observed that the world had become such that no one country
even with paramount strength could afford to stand alone. It had
to join either the East or West. India could get help for
economic development from America, and so it would be wise for
India to be on good terms with the U.S.
Foreign Enclaves in Independent India
Prime Minister Nehru told Parliament on the 1st that continuance
of colonial rule in certain pockets of India was an anachronism
causing friction. Independent India could not have such islands
and footholds of foreign authority adjoining and surrounded by
India's sovereign territory. Geographical, historical, cultural,
political and economic necessities led to the inescapable
conclusion, that such territories become one with India. The
Prime Minister added that the Government of India pursued the
method of peaceful negotiations and settlement which remained the
guiding principle in the conduct of India's foreign relations. No
referendum had been held in the French settlements of
Pondicherry, Karaikal, Mahe and Yanam, and the situation seemed
to have deteriorated after the elections to choose members for
the French National Assembly.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Miscellaneous Previous : No one is exempt from rigours of Divine Law Next : Weather | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|