|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, October 06, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Suicide terrorism
By Suba Chandran
WITH THE recent attacks on the United States, one aspect of
terrorism - suicide terrorism - has assumed importance. Suicide
terrorism should not be seen just as the work of a maniac or a
bunch of maniacs. The concept of suicide terrorism, with all its
manifestations and implications, is essentially modern and a
post-1980 phenomenon. Ever since the first suicide terrorist
attack in October 1983 in Beirut killing more than 250 American
and French peacekeepers, there have been nearly 300 suicide
terrorist attacks all over the globe. An analysis of these
attacks reveals the following aspects.
First, as mentioned above, suicide terrorism is a post-1980
phenomenon. It had very close connections with Iran and came into
being after the revolution in Iran in 1979. The first suicide
attack was carried out by a Shia terrorist group Hezbollah (Army
of Allah), which had very close links with Iran. Most of the
suicidal attacks carried out during the early 1980s were by the
Hezbollah and the Amal, another Shia terrorist organisation.
Second, of the groups that were involved, except LTTE, the rest -
Hezbollah, Amal, Hamas, Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK),
Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), Egyptian Islamic Jihad, Gama'a
al-Islamiya and Al- Qaeda - adhere to the Islamic faith, both
Shia and Sunni.
Third, though the majority of the organisations involved in
suicide terrorism adhere to a particular faith, the objective of
the attacks, primarily, have been political and not religious.
The first ever attack perpetrated by the Hezbollah was to
threaten the U.N. peacekeepers, mainly the Americans and the
French, and prevent any future deployment of U.N. troops in
Lebanon. Additionally, chasing the Israeli troops away from
Lebanon was also an objective of these attacks, one in which the
Hezbollah did succeed; the U.N. peacekeeping forces were
withdrawn and Israel, finding it difficult to cope with a series
of such attacks, retreated. The attacks by the two Egyptian
groups, Egyptian Islamic Jihad and Gama'a al-Islamiya, were
primarily acts of revenge or of disapproval. For example, the
suicidal attack on the Egyptian Embassy in Pakistan in November
1995 was aimed against any possible cooperation between Pakistan
and Egypt in extraditing the terrorist leaders to Egypt. The
attacks of Hamas and the PIJ were purely political and were
mainly aimed at disrupting the peace process between Israel and
the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organisation). The Al-Qaeda, a
recent addition, which is funded by Osama bin Laden and blamed
for the terrorist attacks against the U.S., is in fact anti-West
and, in particular, anti-U.S., though it proclaims of waging a
jehad against the infidels. All these groups use Islam merely to
gain religious legitimacy for their acts.
Fourth, the participation of women in such suicide attacks. More
than one-third of the suicide attacks carried out by the LTTE
were by its women cadres and in the PKK, its women cadres had
undertaken more suicidal attacks than their male counterparts.
Women, in general, are not subjected to serious security checks
which make their task easier. Besides, the participation of women
increases the morale of its women cadres, thereby inviting more
to join the group. Groups such as the LTTE which find it
difficult to get male cadres due to the prolonged war and the
continuous out-migration of Sri Lankan Tamils finds their women
cadres as lethal as their male cadres.
Why do terrorist groups organise suicidal attacks? What are their
objectives and motivations? What does the terrorist group gain,
particularly when there is widespread condemnation of such acts,
from not only Governments, but also the local population and the
international community? The following reasons can be attributed
as to why terrorist groups resort to such suicidal attacks.
First, the psychological impact on the state and its armed forces
against which the act is perpetrated. Any state, however
powerful, finds it extremely difficult to prevent such a
determined act from an individual. The U.S. had to withdraw its
troops from Lebanon after the 1983 attack, and even Israel
retreated from the territory it had occupied. The Sri Lankan
Government finds it totally impossible to deal with the suicide
bombers. Though Ms. Chandrika Kumaratunga survived a suicide
attack, the other leaders of Sri Lanka did not have a chance to
escape. Such fatal attacks on well-protected leaders not only
create terror inside the state but also undermine its legitimacy.
Suicide bombers have also created such terror that political
leaders surround themselves with elaborate security arrangements
often alienating themselves from the public.
Second, the psychological impact on the population. The common
man is thoroughly bewildered and feels totally helpless, which is
the very objective of the terrorist groups - to alienate the
population from the Government and make them feel that their
Government is impotent. Third, the morale of the terrorist group
that perpetrates the suicide attack. Many a time, suicidal
attacks by an organisation has been to boost the morale of its
cadres and overcome the remorse caused by any military loss. The
LTTE has always resorted to suicidal attacks whenever it met with
any major debacle at the hands of the Sri Lankan armed forces;
the PKK too was involved in suicidal attacks to boost its image
among its own cadres and among the population whose cause it
supposedly served. The LTTE is one among the few organisations
that has an institutionalised suicide wing - Karumpuligal (Black
Tigers). July 5 is celebrated as the day of the Black Tigers.
Such glorification boosts the morale of the cadres. In Jammu and
Kashmir, the terrorist groups prefer to call themselves
``fidayeen'' (suicide squads), though their attacks are primarily
based on a hit-and-run strategy.
Fourth, suicidal attacks provide a lot of publicity and media
attention to the group that is involved. The Hezbollah became
very popular in the early 1980s mainly because of its suicidal
attacks. The publicity factor is significant as it not only makes
it popular, but also helps the group get more recruits.
Especially in regions such as West Asia and South Asia, where a
number of groups claim to represent the same population, suicidal
attacks make them serious, powerful and invincible among those
who are willing to take the extremist path. It is no coincidence
that the Hamas, Hezbollah and the LTTE, which are able to get
cadres continuously, are those groups that have
``institutionalised'' suicide squads and have a separate suicide
wing. Another aspect of the publicity is the funding. When there
are a number of groups espousing the same cause, suicidal attacks
enable the groups to mobilise more funds - both from internal and
external sources. Again, it is more than mere coincidence that
the groups that have suicide wings are the most funded.
Fifth, suicide attacks, though requiring a lot of preparation,
are cost effective despite the loss of a single life or two. In
Beirut, more than 250 soldiers were killed with just one suicide
killer in a Mercedes in 1983; 40 soldiers were killed in Sri
Lanka in 1987 with a single driver riding his truck into a
makeshift camp; more than 200 were killed in Nairobi and Dar es
Saalam in 1998; and thousands have died in the recent air attacks
on the U.S. The number of lives that the terrorist groups lost in
these operations and the cost incurred in carrying out these
attacks is negligible when compared to the human and material
cost on the other side. Other than the recent attack on the U.S.
in which hijacked planes were used as delivery vehicles, in most
other attacks, the delivery vehicles were either bicycles (the
LTTE's favourite) or stolen cars and trucks.
How to tackle suicide terrorism? Security measures in the past,
however elaborate they may have been, have proved inadequate. It
is the difficulty in tackling such an extreme form of terrorism
that makes it so significant.
(The writer is Research Officer, Institute of Peace and Conflict
Studies, New Delhi.)
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Learning to forget Next : Unlimited terror | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|