|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, October 07, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
New plan to oust Taliban?
By Hasan Suroor
LONDON, OCT. 6. Alongside hectic military preparations, Britain
and the U.S. are reported to be working on plans that could see
the Taliban regime in Afghanistan topple without a shot being
fired. The new strategy, according to reports circulating here,
is aimed at getting rid of the main ``obstacle'' in the way of
reaching Osama bin Laden, possibly through diplomatic efforts in
view of the palpable unease, particularly in the Muslim world,
about backing a huge military operation against Kabul.
Analysts said the new thinking was also an admission that the
Western intelligence had no idea where Bin Laden was and that a
``blind'' military operation to hunt him down could go terribly
wrong. A friendly government, especially if it comprised moderate
Taliban elements, was seen as a less risky route to Bin Laden and
his network. The Taliban Foreign Minister, Mr. Wakil Ahmed
Muttawakil, is being mentioned as among the prominent moderates
most likely to be included in a new dispensation vaguely
described as ``broad-based and democratic''.
There is apparently anxiety that the change should appear to have
come from ``within'', rather than imposed by the West as an act
of vengeance. ``The U.S. and Britain are sensitive to accusations
from Muslim countries that they are trying to foist a government
on Afghanistan,'' The Guardian said. The Taliban component in the
alternative regime is also said to be vital because of their
influence on the Pushtuns.
Significantly, it is being emphasised here that the Northern
Alliance is not seen as a viable alternative by itself and one
British official is quoted as saying that handing over
Afghanistan to the Northern Alliance would be a ``recipe for
disaster''. What is envisaged is a coalition of wide-ranging
tribal and ethnic interests with the former Afghanistan king
Zahir Shah, who lives in Rome in exile, serving as a nominal
head. There is a strong possibility of the U.N. playing a key
role in any transition, and the appointment of Mr. Lakhdar
Brahimi, an Algerian-born diplomat, as the U.N.'s chief envoy to
Afghanistan - a post believed to have been specially created to
deal with the present crisis - is seen as a pointer to U.N.'s
involvement.
Observers said the Prime Minister, Mr. Tony Blair's visit to
Pakistan was intended to ``hard sell'' the post-Taliban scenario
to Islamabad and he appeared to have succeeded in breaking down
the military regime's resistance on the issue. The Times said the
Pakistan President, Gen. Parvez Musharraf's willingness to accept
a post-Taliban scenario was regarded by Britain as ``an important
breakthrough'' in its bid to draw Islamabad more firmly into the
Western alliance. It said this was the first time that he was
``prepared to countenance'' such a prospect.
The media grapevine, meanwhile, buzzed with speculation that the
Taliban were slowly ``disintegrating'' and faced large-scale
defections from their ranks. With their traditional sources of
funding - Saudi Arabia, UAE and Pakistan, among others - having
dried up the Taliban were said to be confronted with the prospect
of losing the tribal loyalties bought with money. ``There are
already reports of large-scale defections from the Taliban and
the likelihood is that some who call themselves Taliban today
will take off their black turbans and change sides,'' one
newspaper said. Most media reports appeared to have been inspired
by official briefings as they used almost identical language in
predicting the demise of the Taliban.
``Experts'' were poring over the video footage of Bin Laden,
released by a Qatar-based TV channel, for clues to his location
and much interest was focussed on whether it was taken before or
after the September 11 terrorist attacks in America. While the TV
channel did not say when it was made, The Times insisted that it
was ``believed'' to have been made after September 11 and was
released ``in a calculated gesture of contempt for America,
Britain and the countries mobilising against him''.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Operation anytime now? Next : Rushdie's poser to Muslims | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|