|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, October 11, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Next
Why JeM is not banned?
By Neena Vyas
NEW DELHI, OCT. 10. The Union Home Ministry has suggested to the
Jammu and Kashmir Government that it ban the terrorist outfit,
Jaish-e-Mohammed, but the State has suggested that the Centre
should take the step. The JeM ball is being tossed between the
Centre and the State even as India made it clear that it would
like to see the organisation on the American blacklist.
The Centre is limited by the fact that if it were to ban the JeM
under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, it would
automatically lead to the matter being brought before a tribunal.
Since no proof is available about its involvement in specific
terrorist activities (proof that would stand legal scrutiny by a
tribunal) the Centre is reluctant to go ahead with the ban. Also,
the JeM has no offices or lists of known members. It is an
underground organisation, so the Government will be unable to
raid and seal offices and follow up on a ban, highly-placed Home
Ministry sources said.
On the other hand, the Jammu and Kashmir Government could use the
Disturbed Areas Act, under which security agencies could
recommend such a ban on the JeM. This would not come under the
purview of any tribunal.
It was also pointed out that the Government was keen that the U.S
pressure Pakistan to ban the organisation as it was based in
Pakistan, its known leaders were there, and they functioned from
known addresses and offices. If it was banned in Pakistan (under
the watchful eyes of the USA), where it functions openly, and if
its accounts were to be frozen as a result, that would be a big
gain.
A senior BJP leader indicated that the U.S had asked Pakistan to
arrest the JeM leaders and ban the outfit. But Pakistan had
pleaded that it would like to take a few steps at a time
otherwise it could head for a civil war. It had already arrested
several leaders of the Harkat-ul Mujahideen (HuM) and the Jamait-
e-Ulema Islam (JUI) and it pleaded for some more time before it
took action against the JeM.
It was the Jaish-e-Mohammed which was reported to be behind the
``fidayeen'' attack on the Srinagar assembly on October 1, and
after that India had conveyed to the U.S. that it would like to
see this organisation headed by Maulana Masood Azar (freed by
India in exchange for hostages of 1999 hijacking of an Indian
Airlines plane from Kathmandu to Kandahar) on its list of
declared and banned terrorist organisations.
When the U.S President, Mr. George Bush, talked to the Prime
Minister, Mr A.B. Vajpayee, recently, he gave him an indication
that the U.S. would consider putting the JeM on the terrorist
list. In fact, reports have indicated that it is being placed on
the U.S. ``watch list.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Next : Vajpayee to revive Ayodhya cell | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|