|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, October 13, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Role for India in war against terrorism?
By Sridhar Krishnaswami
WASHINGTON, OCT. 12. As the U.S. Secretary of State, Gen. Colin
Powell's trip to India nears, there is the perception that the
Pentagon wishes New Delhi to play a role in the American-led
coalition attacks against the Al-Qaeda terror network. As of now,
the impression is that Indo-U.S. interactions have been on the
intelligence sharing levels vis-a-vis Afghanistan. And Defence
Department officials have not elaborated on what a ``role'' for
India could entail.
At a time when the political leadership in India has been
maintaining that no blank cheque was given to the U.S. in the
present war efforts against Afghanistan, Gen. Powell's deputy,
Mr. Richard Armitage, sees it differently. India had shown
``fantastic'' support; came forward first and said, `Anything the
United States needs, you've got,'`` the Deputy Secretary of
State, who was briefing newspersons on Gen. Powell's visit, said.
The Secretary of State is travelling to the sub continent under
the vastly changed circumstances of the last four weeks. From
being nearly written off as a failed state and having come very
close to being put in the books as a state sponsor of terror,
Pakistan finds itself in totally different situation. Islamabad
is now in the frontline of the fight against terrorism, something
that has naturally riled India, given what is taking place in
Jammu and Kashmir.
Gen. Powell will be reassuring New Delhi of the long term aspects
of Indo-U.S. relations.
At the same time he will be careful in not wanting to be drawn
into a discussion of Pakistan's credentials on even being a party
to the ongoing war against terrorism. Sources believe that Gen.
Powell will say or do nothing that would put the regime of Gen.
Pervez Musharraf in a tighter spot than it is in now.
India has made its point on more than one occasion on Pakistan's
role in fomenting terrorism and violence in Jammu and Kashmir.
The U.S. is very aware of what is taking place on the ground.
It does not require qualifications of a rocket scientist to
figure out what is happening by way of terrorism in the Indian
subcontinent.
At the same it takes some political savvy to realise that
constantly harping on Pakistan's nexus with terrorists does not
serve New Delhi's political interests here.
The larger environment would have to be taken into account: this
is America's war on terrorism and Pakistan has signed on to it
and is the frontline state in the efforts against Afghanistan.
And no one in the political establishment is in any mood to
antagonise Islamabad.
But this does not mean that Washington will not have anything to
say at all to Pakistan.
In fact it is felt that it was because of pressure from the Bush
administration that Pakistan has started cracking down on
domestic extremism; and that a non-extremist Pakistan is in
India's interest.
But if New Delhi feels that Washington at this juncture will
publicly pressure Mr. Musharraf to rein in the terrorist groups
in Jammu and Kashmir, that is very unlikely to take place.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Powell to ask Pak. to deny facilities to terrorists Next : U.S. must restrict attacks, says Pak. | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|