|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, October 14, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
House seeks changes to anti-terror Bill
By Sridhar Krishnaswami
WASHINGTON, OCT. 13. The House of Representatives has given its
approval to the Senate's Anti-Terrorism Bill but failed to give
full approval to the changes sought by the other chamber and the
White House. The administration wants sweeping powers to tackle
terrorism - power to spy on, detain and punish suspects.
The House of Representatives is willing to back the Senate but
with changes. For instance, the House insists on placing a five-
year deadline on intrusive measures like roving wiretaps. It has
rejected a Senate provision on money laundering, instead coming
up with its own version.
The House passed the Bill by a margin of 337 to 79 and the vote
on Thursday in the Senate was by a margin of 96 to 1. The House
has sent its version to the Senate for consideration and Senate
and White House negotiators will look into the same. But several
key Senators like the Democratic Majority leader, Mr. Tom
Daschle, are insistent on the money laundering provision. Despite
the differences which the administration hopes will be sorted out
by early next week, the White House expressed satisfaction that
the legislation came through. The FBI's power to wiretap has been
substantially increased and there are stronger penalties for
those harbouring terrorists. But the House version has put the
onus on the Government to prove that a suspect is a terrorist.
``The House and the Senate bills are virtually identical. I urge
the Congress to quickly get the Bill to my desk. We must
strengthen the hand of law enforcement to help safeguard America
and prevent future attacks - and we must do it now,'' the
President, Mr. George W Bush said.
Though the anti-terrorism legislation has sailed through Capitol
Hill, there are fears that it may be misused. A Democratic
lawmaker said, ``This could be the Gulf of Tonkin resolution for
civil liberties, instead of a measure meant to fight terrorism.''
Former President Lyndon Johnson used a reported firing on
American ships to get a sweeping resolution passed in 1964 and
used it every time to expand the war in Vietnam.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : 'Capturing Osama no mean task' Next : Robinson warns of humanitarian crisis | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|