|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, October 15, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Agreement cannot be quantified: Maran
By Amit Baruah
SINGAPORE, OCT. 14 The Union Commerce Minister, Mr. Murasoli
Maran, said today that he did not want to give a ``quantitative
measurement'' on the extent of agreement on a draft Ministerial
declaration discussed by Trade Ministers from 21 countries over
the week-end.
``I don't have the quantitative measurement, I am very sorry,''
Mr. Maran said when asked to comment on remarks made by the U.S.
Trade Representative, Mr. Robert Zoellick, that ``75 per cent
agreement'' had been reached on the draft declaration.
Addressing a press conference, the Commerce Minister said he was
happy to go to Doha despite hints of a possible change in venue
for the Doha Ministerial Meeting, the dates of which (November 9-
13) may well remain the same.
Asked to comment on a remark made by the European Union Trade
Commissioner, Mr. Pascal Lamy, that a ``quasi- consensus'' had
been reached on implementation issues, Mr. Maran said: ``There
can only be consensus, not quasi-consensus.''
``In the draft (declaration), all the implementation issues have
been divided into three annexures... we wanted the language in
annexure one and annexure two improved and issues not covered in
these brought forward. The remaining issues should be addressed
through a credible process,'' he said.
Improvements needed
Implementation issues, Mr. Maran said, constituted the
``cornerstone of the edifice of demands'' of developing
countries. Asked if India was ``satisfied'', he said: ``We are
not at all fully satisfied. Substantial improvements are
necessary...''
Asked what India's position on a new round of trade negotiations
following the discussions in Singapore was, Mr. Maran said: ``It
is not a question of round. What is important is the issues we
are going to take up (for discussion).''
Mr. Maran said there was controversy on the word ``round'' -
there was no mention of the word in the draft declaration. There
were also proposals that a new term be used to replace ``round''.
``What we are interested in is the issues... what will be the
pains and gains for a country like ours. These are the important
issues... you can call it by any name,'' he said.
After the September 11 attacks in the U.S., the whole world was
``one''. At this point of time, we should not create a cleavage
by creating two categories of ``developed and developing''
countries.
India had ``strong reservations'' about what are called
``Singapore issues'' - of competition and investment. Some other
countries had similar views on the question, he said. The
Commerce Minister said the Singapore meeting had served a useful
purpose. Some countries agreed that annexure one and two should
be merged, the language in them improved and the remaining issues
put in a fast-track process for a resolution.
``This is not Doha (where the formal Ministerial meeting is to be
held), this is Singapore... there are 142 countries which are WTO
members. They are the people who should decide,'' Mr. Maran said.
Asked if he was ``upbeat`` about the launch of a new round, Mr.
Maran said, ``There is no question of upbeatness. Simply about 20
countries exchanged views about the draft... it (the new round)
all depends on the reaction of other countries...'' The Commerce
Minister also wondered whether ``today's stand'' would continue
until Doha.
Asked whether he was concerned at Doha being the ``venue'', Mr.
Maran replied: ''No, not at all.``
Asked to what extent India's views represented those of other
developing countries, the Commerce Minister said that developing
countries had not formed any kind of alliance.
Asked if there was agreement that the new round be called ``new
development agenda'', Mr. Maran said ``nobody'' had agreed to
this. Mr. Maran, who called it ``development round'', said if
this was the case it should include ``all development issues''.
``If you want to call it development round, let's collect all
development issues and discuss them and categorise them,'' Mr.
Maran added.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Terrorism has hurt Kashmir cause: Benazir Next : WTO meet may be shifted from Doha? | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|