|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, October 16, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
1,046 acres of excess land to be distributed
By Our Special Correspondent
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, OCT. 15. The Revenue Minister, Mr. K. M.
Mani, said in the Assembly today that the State Government would
take steps to distribute 1,046 acres of excess land, besides
taking over another 2,821 acres which did not have any legal
hurdles.
Replying to a debate on the Kerala Stay of Eviction Proceedings
Bill, 2001, Mr. Mani said the Bill was being introduced only as a
temporary measure till a comprehensive legislation seeking to
amend the Kerala Land Reforms Act and regularise the holdings of
small farmers and cultivating tenants was passed.
The Government was willing to order a probe into any allegation
of malpractice in land deals involving excess land taken over by
the Government.
Raising objections, the CPI(M) leader, Mr. Kodiyeri Balakrishnan,
feared that the new legislation would lead to tinkering with the
Land Reforms Act.
Deviating from the positions of the former LDF Government, he
said there were several lapses in the survey conducted in the
Vadakkekara estate and the bigwigs had escaped eviction. So,
eviction of farmers from their land at a time when the State was
going through a major farm crisis was unjustified, he said.
He lamented that there was no system which could check
malpractice involving excess land. He alleged that several acres
of land declared as excess had been transferred in the name of a
Muslim education society to run a college in Perinthalmanna.
The atmosphere turned tense when Mr. Kodiyeri went on to allege
that the Education Minister, Mr. Nalakath Soopy, was in the know
of the deal.
Mr. Soopy promptly denied the charge and it was left to his IUML
colleagues to take up cudgels against Mr. Kodiyeri. The IUML
leader, Mr. C. Moinkutty, alleged that the CPI(M) had taken
possession of excess land in Thamarassery for its party office.
Mr. Balakrishnan took exception to the dual stand of the
Government regarding revalidating the lapsed provisions in the
Ordinance.
This discrimination was to be seen in the provisions of the
Kerala Forest Bill and the Kerala Stay Proceedings Bill.
The Kerala Stay of Eviction Proceedings Bill, 2001, which was
later referred to the Subject Committee seeks to protect the
cultivating tenant or small holder who holds or possesses any
land by way of assignment or otherwise as purchase for purchaser
for consideration evidenced by registered document or otherwise
and which is subsequently found to be excess land surrendered
under the provisions of the Kerala Land Reforms Act of 1963.
The bill seeks to give protection to these segments from eviction
from July 18, 2001 to March 30 2002.
According to the Bill's statement of objects and reasons,
numerous proceedings are pending before land tribunals, taluk
land boards and the State land board, the courts of the revenue
authorities or other authorities wherein small land-holders and
cultivating tenants who purchased or otherwise acquired land for
consideration, evidenced by registered documents or otherwise,
are under threat of eviction or dispossession.
The Government is examining the feasibility of bringing a
comprehensive amendment to the Kerala Land Reforms Act for
protecting such small land-holders and cultivating tenants from
eviction and dispossession, besides protecting their rights and
interests in such land.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : BMP to curb indiscriminate sinking of borewells Next : RSS, Christian leaders to hold talks | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|