|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, October 16, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Next
Still under a cloud
THE RE-INDUCTION OF Mr. George Fernandes as the Defence Minister,
without waiting for the findings of the Venkataswami Commission
currently going into the defence purchases-related Tehelka
expose, has reduced to a farce the very rationale behind his
resignation six months ago in the wake of the murky revelations.
His return, effected in an unseemly hurry, is in stark contrast
to the rehabilitation of Mr. Harin Pathak, who was sworn in as a
Minister of State along with Mr. Fernandes and who, like him, has
been assigned to the same Ministry as before - Defence. Mr.
Pathak who had to quit about a year ago after being chargesheeted
by a Gujarat court in a criminal case has since been acquitted.
The irony of it all - a cruel one at that - is that Mr.
Fernandes' re-entry - as Defence Minister to boot - has come just
a few days after the inquiry panel had rejected the contention
that the Tehelka videotapes were `doctored', thereby upholding
the credibility of the portal's version, even if in a broad
sense. If this reveals a streak of defiance, one could also
discern a lurking contempt for the labours of the Venkataswami
Commission itself. So much for the Centre's sincerity in setting
up the probe and its earnestness about tracking down the corrupt
elements and identifying systemic weaknesses.
But then, the Prime Minister, Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee, had never
concealed his sympathies for Mr. Fernandes even in the face of
Tehelka's damaging expose. Only when it became well-nigh
impossible for him to fend off pressure from the crucial partners
of the ruling National Democratic Alliance - notably the Telugu
Desam Party and the Trinamool Congress - and also from a section
of his own party, the BJP, did Mr. Vajpayee persuade himself to
secure the resignation of Mr. Fernandes. Behind the facade of
`solidarity' projected by the NDA partners, for obvious reasons,
was an acute consciousness of the untenability of Mr. Fernandes'
continuance in office and the unwisdom of persisting with the
dubious `conspiracy' theory. His declared resolve to run a
``clean and transparent'' Defence Ministry notwithstanding, at
least two aspects of the sordid reality the Tehelka tapes had
brought into sharp focus are too serious to be wished away or
glossed over. First, that several officials in the Ministry and
in the key decision-making positions in the Army were on the
take, and, second, that the very residence of the Minister served
as the venue for an apparently murky monetary transaction
involving his own party chief. These and other facets of the
expose added up to a milieu of all-pervasive permissiveness
obtaining in the official establishment related to an area of
critical importance to national security. As the one at the helm,
Mr. Fernandes has certainly a lot to answer for the squalid state
of affairs in the departments under his charge.
The argument that the proceedings of the Venkataswami Commission
are getting prolonged and the panel is unlikely to come up with
its findings for several more months (implied here is the
presumption that Mr. Fernandes would get a clean chit) is
specious. No less so is Mr. Vajpayee's line that the Samata
veteran has ``no case'' against him and ``nothing incriminating
has come to light'' during the panel's inquiry. That the External
Affairs Minister, Mr. Jaswant Singh, needed to be relieved of his
additional charge and `Defence' required a full-time Minister is
unexceptionable. In fact, two such heavy portfolios should not
have been clubbed in the first place. The point at issue is not
about the necessity or urgency for a full-fledged Defence
Minister. Nor is it about the competence or suitability of Mr.
Fernandes for the assignment. It is primarily about more basic
values and vital societal concerns such as probity in public
life, political morality and, in a broader sense, the rule of
law. By taking Mr. Fernandes back into his Cabinet in the way he
has done, Mr. Vajpayee has clearly ill-served these causes and in
a brazen fashion.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Next : Germs of war | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|