|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, October 17, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Relations within alliance strained, admits ANC
By M.S. Prabhakara
CAPE TOWN, OCT. 16. For perhaps the first time, the African
National Congress (ANC) has openly acknowledged the ``strained
relations'' within the ruling tripartite alliance, comprising
itself, the South African Communist Party (SACP) and the Congress
of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu), relating them to ``a
range of ideological, policy, strategic, structural and tactical
differences'' among the partners of the alliance.
The ANC is holding meetings with its regional and branch
leadership countrywide on ``the state of the organisation's
alliance'' with the SACP and Cosatu. The decision to hold such
meetings ``to facilitate discussion among the ANC members on the
challenges facing the tripartite alliance'' was taken by the
ANC's national executive committee, the party's highest policy-
making body, recently. The NEC will also be having ``a series of
bilateral meetings'' with the SACP and Cosatu, ahead of an
alliance summit expected to be held before the end of this year.
These organisational discussions within the tripartite alliance
are taking place against the background of what the ANC openly
admits as ``a period of strained relations between the member
organisations of the alliance''.
Two documents on the state of the tripartite alliance in the
latest issue of the ANC's online weekly journal, ANC Today, based
on the deliberations of the NEC, frankly discuss the differences
among the components of the alliance that have given rise to
these ``strained relations''. Though this is not the first time
that components of the alliance have openly spoken of such
problems, the two documents identify some of the political and
organisational issues that have given rise to these ``strained
relations'', as well as attributing these to specifically
identified structures within the alliance.
For instance, according to document one, these tensions ``were
brought to a head'' by Cosatu's general strike against the
Government's programme of restructuring State assets, which
coincided with South Africa's hosting of the World Conference
against Racism in Durban. However, it also acknowledges that the
strike itself took place against the backdrop of problems in the
alliance ``for at least the last five years'', arising out of ``a
range of ideological, policy, strategic, structural and tactical
differences''.
In essence, these differences relate to the yet to be completed
task facing the democratic government, the National Democratic
Revolution (NDR). Everyone agrees that the demise of the
apartheid regime and the democratic transition has created
conditions to facilitate the NDR; but differences do exist, both
in respect of the content of the envisaged NDR as well as the
strategy and tactics of achieving that objective.
For instance, did the struggle to achieve the NDR, an admittedly
multi-class undertaking related to issues of nationalism and
democracy, also have a socialist component and so necessarily
also involve ``class struggle''? How does one view the process of
``black empowerment'' that is supported on all sides in this
larger context of growing class contradictions within the black,
indeed, black African people?
These issues are indeed constantly debated within the alliance;
they figure prominently in every important document.
A crucial passage in document two gives an indication of what the
ANC leadership's present thinking of the linkages of the
struggles for nationalism and democracy, and class struggle - a
historically given linkage during the liberation struggle. ``The
NEC identified an increasing tendency within the SACP, Cosatu and
even the ANC to try to `detach' the working class and working
class struggles from the broad multi-class struggle for national
liberation. All of these aims are pursued under the banner of
``taking forward working class struggles''.
It warned of the dangers of this approach. Lessons from other
struggles teach us that the surest way to defeat the working
class is to fight a pure class struggle.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : All not well between Saudi Arabia, U.S. Next : Special Forces gunship deployed to blast targets | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|