|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, October 17, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Next
Need for restraint
THE INTENSIVE SHELLING of some Pakistani military positions by
the Indian Army on Monday night has exposed the fragility of the
Vajpayee administration's strategic thinking on the Kashmir issue
in the present volatile international situation. New Delhi should
first guard against making any move that might result in a
dangerous drift towards full-scale hostilities with Pakistan. To
say this is not to ignore or belittle the sense of outrage that
the Indian Army in the Mendhar and Akhnoor sectors of Jammu and
Kashmir obviously felt as regards the Pakistan-encouraged
terrorist infiltration into the Indian side of the Line of
Control (LoC) in this particular instance. However, an apparently
trigger-happy response to the perception of a provocative
infiltration carried the elementary hallmark of routine ground-
level tactics. The available accounts indicate that India's field
commanders considered it prudent to target some Pakistani
military infrastructure in a ``punitive action'' that was aimed
at pre-emptively discouraging such terrorist infiltrations in the
future. In a sense, there is nothing very unusual about the
latest infiltration or even the Indian response except for their
timing, but this reality is of critical importance. There can be
no two opinions indeed about the need for utmost vigil by India's
military forces. Not arguable, too, is the principle of
sustaining their morale at a very high pitch. However, New Delhi
should move beyond the threshold of statesmanship while meeting
the suspected efforts by Pakistan to raise the diplomatic-
military stakes concerning Jammu and Kashmir at this enormously
sensitive stage.
The spiralling tensions in India's extended neighbourhood are
undeniably the direct consequence of Washington's ongoing war in
Afghanistan. Moreover, official Pakistan was among the first to
make common cause with the U.S. over what is now turning into an
unpredictable and messy adventure. The ongoing American military
offensive in Afghanistan is also beginning to cause considerable
discomfort within the Islamic bloc. In the books of the Vajpayee
administration, Pakistan therefore figures as an increasingly
unstable state in quest of America's strategic support over the
Kashmir issue at this time. New Delhi's transparent concern is
that Islamabad may see the Kashmir `cause' as the political glue
that could keep Pakistan together in these circumstances. This
explains the External Affairs Ministry's denunciation of Pakistan
for ``exaggerating'' Monday night's ``incidents along the LoC''
so as to ``misuse'' the U.S. Secretary of State's current visit
to South Asia.
What New Delhi has so far failed to see in today's nebulous
international environment is the sagacity of adopting a policy of
strategic restraint in regard to Pakistan. Instead, some policy-
planners, such as Mr. L. K. Advani with no hands-on
responsibility for navigating India's foreign policy through
uncharted but troubled waters, have even advocated a ``hot
pursuit'' of the Kashmir-related terrorists behind the Pakistani
lines along the LoC. Now, it requires no elaborate reasoning to
recognise that India's national interest will be best served at
this moment by a decision against imitating America's current
ideas and manoeuvres that include the notion of a hot pursuit of
Osama bin Laden, don of international terror. A policy of
meaningful caution about the U.S.' aims will indeed enable New
Delhi to exercise strategic restraint in respect of Pakistan too.
It will be a foolhardy recipe at this juncture if New Delhi were
to shift its stance, unwittingly or otherwise, from its own
admirable record of military and political restraint as practised
with consummate ease at the height of the Kargil crisis not long
ago. In a sense, India's stature on the international stage rose
dramatically in that Kargil context. Those moral and political
gains must not be frittered away. Given also the inter-linked
political destinies of India and Pakistan, the two can and should
seek to coexist through a continuous process of dialogue before
and after a settlement of the Kashmir issue.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Next : Shepherding the media | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|