|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, October 18, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Ex-SC judge seeks pension parity
By Our Legal Correspondent
NEW DELHI, OCT. 17. Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, retired judge of
the Supreme Court has moved the court seeking parity of pension
and medical facilities for retired judges of the apex court.
The Attorney-General, Mr. Soli Sorabjee, told a bench comprising
Mr. Justice B.N. Kirpal and Mr. Justice Ashok Bhan, before whom
the two petitions came up for hearing today that he would take up
the matter with the Government authorities concerned to arrive at
a settlement and sought time till November 8.
The bench told the Attorney-General that it would be advisable to
have a uniform pension for retired judges of the High Courts and
Supreme Court on basis of the last salary drawn.
In his petitions, Mr. Justice Singh, who was appointed a judge of
the Supreme Court directly from the Bar, pointed out that under
the revised pension rules, a retired judge of the Supreme Court
would draw an annual pension of Rs. 14,630, multiplied by the
number of years he served as a judge in the apex court subject to
a maximum of Rs. 1,80,000 per annum.
He submitted that there was almost an established convention that
no advocate below the age of 55 years would be considered for
appointment as judge of the Supreme Court leaving a maximum of 10
years as a judge. Thus, an advocate appointed as judge could
never claim the full pension, as a Supreme Court judge retires at
the age of 65 years.
However, Mr. Justice Singh said that if a High Court judge was
elevated to the Supreme Court, he would invariably have more than
10 years of service and moreover his service as a High Court
judge would also be taken into account thus entitling him to full
pension of Rs. 1,80,000.
Mr. Justice Singh, who was a judge of the apex court for eight
years, said, ``there are more than 20 retired Supreme Court
judges who have served as Supreme Court judges for lesser number
of years than him and yet all of them are drawing more pension
than the petitioner.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Forfeiture of pension upheld Next : Maharashtra to move London court in Enron case | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|