|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, October 18, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Vandalism at the Taj
THE ACTS OF vandalism perpetrated on the premises of the Taj
Mahal last Sunday by some elements of the Bharatiya Janata Yuva
Morcha, which have prompted judicial intervention, are extremely
disturbing for two reasons. First is, of course, the fact that
the nation's priceless and most prestigious monument of cultural
heritage has become vulnerable to attacks by unruly mobs, which
points sharply to the parlous state of the security and
regulatory mechanisms. Add to it the insidious threat the edifice
has already come under because of the polluting industries
located in its vicinity - and which is vigorously sought to be
mitigated by the apex court through judicious interventions from
time to time - the picture is complete, a matter of heightened
concern. The second reason, and one that is potentially more
dangerous to India's secular and pluralist identity, is that the
incident represents a new benchmark in the audacity displayed by
the Sangh Parivar in attacking the religious minorities, their
places of worship and their symbols, a trend perceivable ever
since the BJP made it to the seat of power at the Centre as the
lead coalition partner. It has emerged that even a famed national
heritage like the Taj, which - as the Supreme Court noted -
belonged to the ``whole of India and all communities'', may not
really be safe, given the sheer intolerance of the Hindutva
forces and the virulent hate campaign they are running on a
sustained basis.
What sets the Taj episode apart from other instances of the Sangh
Parivar-linked vandalism is that the perpetrators manifestly
belonged to the youth wing of the BJP (which was holding its two-
day convention at Agra), not to its ideological fountainhead, the
RSS, nor to its more aggressive cousins, the Vishwa Hindu
Parishad and the Bajrang Dal - the ones that have mostly come in
for adverse notice, either directly or indirectly, in the various
acts of violence, serious and not-so-serious, targeting the
religious minorities reported across the country - from the
demolition of the Babri Masjid to attacks on Christian
institutions in Dangs to the murder of Graham Staines and his two
sons, not to speak of the numerous cases of
desecration/destruction of churches and mosques in remote areas.
With the suspected involvement of the cadre of its Yuva Morcha,
the BJP can no longer have the luxury of distancing itself from
the abrasively anti-minority ways of the likes of the VHP and the
Bajrang Dal, something it has been trying to do for sustaining
itself in power as the head of the ideologically-compromised
National Democratic Alliance. And this, even granting that the
youth wing, as an organisation, was not behind the vandalism.
To say that it was the irrational fringe elements of the BJYM
that went on the ramapage, as such elements tend to do
irrespective of their organisational affiliation, is to forget
the heavy dose of Hindutva-concentrate that was administered to
them at the Agra convention which obviously provided the
motivational urge to do what they did. It should not be difficult
to comprehend the serious implications of the negative signal the
BJYM elements' handiwork is bound to send to the minority
communities, specifically the Muslims, given the atmosphere of
unease and uncertainty the current global anti-terrorism campaign
has engendered in them. Set the Taj episode along with the VHP's
palpable foolhardiness in going ahead with its calibrated
Ayodhya-temple project (to climax in the start of temple
construction in March next year) - it has already got the first
phase (`jalabhishek' programme in select temples) going - and the
Sangh Parivar's utter insensitivity to the genuine concerns of
the minority community will stand out bold and clear. And this
only gets further accentuated when viewed in the context of the
alacrity with which the Centre clamped a ban on the Students
Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) for its allegedly subversive
activities and perceived links with pan-Islamic terrorist
outfits, a punitive action that contrasted sharply with its
refusal to apply the same yardstick to the Bajrang Dal which is
spreading hate.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : The terrorism ordinance Next : Stirring the communal cauldron | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|