|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, October 18, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Miscellaneous
| Previous
| Next
Glorious traditions kept by kings of yore
CHENNAI, OCT. 18. In the ancient system of political
administration, it was considered expedient and prudent for a
ruler to hand over power to another who is found more
intelligent, capable, meritorious and sagacious. This was
desirable in the interest of the people and the country. An
administrator with lesser excellence should not dominate over
others better suited for the throne. Another glorious tradition
which existed in olden days was the power being entrusted by the
king to his son who had been well-equipped in all spheres. The
father indeed felt happy and was proud when he saw his son's
(possible successor) popularity. Hearing words of appreciation
uttered by people about his son, the king will be more happy.
Again in days of yore, a king was always guided by a team of able
ministers who symbolised honesty, integrity and efficiency. It
was their duty to tender proper advice, unmindful of the
consequences. They were not sycophants or mere yes-men. They were
fearless in expressing their views though these may be quite at
variance with what the king held or which may provoke him. They
were even prepared to die but would not allow blatant mistakes to
occur. Thirukkural has a fine couplet on the duty of a minister
to offer genuine counsel.
Once a king tested those around him by asking them to quote the
price he would fetch if he was sold. Naturally many vied with one
another giving fabulous and staggering amounts. One person,
however, said he would be worth just a few copper coins. The king
got wild, removed the belt and was about to thrash him when the
former said, now he would not obtain even the cost of the belt.
Sita, when kept captive and when visited by Ravana, wondered
whether he had no ministers who could tender candid advice to him
not to covet another's wife.
In a lecture, Sri Sukhi Sivam explained how the Ramayana presents
the scene brilliantly where Emperor Dasaratha, who admired the
accomplishments of Rama and who thought it high time that the
burden of sovereignty was lifted off his tired shoulders,
convened an assembly of ministers and others to tell them of his
choice of Rama as the heir to throne. ``Old and infirm, I yearn
for peace and rest. I am not aware of anyone worthier than Rama
to succeed me. However, the final decision rests with you''. The
ministers' unanimous view was conveyed through Sumantra, the
chief among them. Then Dasaratha turned to his preceptor,
Vasishta, who had the final say.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Miscellaneous Previous : Solution to puzzle 7187 Next : dated October 18, 1951: Liaqat Ali Khan shot dead | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|