|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, October 21, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Previous
Fracas over venue of WTO ministerial meet
By C. Rammanohar Reddy
Reports from Geneva indicate that the high-handedness of the U.S.
and the EU in expressing their ``security concerns" about meeting
in Doha, Qatar, for the fourth ministerial conference of the
World Trade Organisation, has created a fracas that threatens to
wreck the very convening of the meeting, thereby unsettling their
best laid plans to launch a new round of trade liberalisation
talks next month.
Until ten days ago, officials of the WTO insisted that the
meeting would be held as scheduled in Doha between November 9 and
12. But now the response to queries about the venue is ``No
comment," meaning that they expect (hope) a change will take
place. The reason for this shift in position is that at the
`informal' meeting of ministers from 21 countries that was held
in Singapore on October 13 and 14, Japan raised concerns about
security, a position subsequently joined by the U.S. and the EU.
In what appeared to be a pre-arranged decision taken without
consulting Qatar, Singapore then offered to be a ``replacement"
venue with a scaled down ministerial meeting away from the
presumed fallout of the U.S. bombing of Afghanistan. (In
Singapore, Mr. Murasoli Maran, the Union Commerce Minister, said
India had no problems going to Doha.)
The expectation then was that the Qatar Emirate would offer to
stand down and let Singapore be the new host. But upset at what
is seen as manoeuvres between the U.S., EU, Singapore and the WTO
Secretariat, the Government of Qatar has so far refused to give
up its right to hold the meeting. After a cabinet meeting on
October 17 it announced that all preparations were on schedule.
Qatar has particular reason to feel aggrieved by the attempts to
push it aside since not only has it spent a considerable amount
of money ($50 million) to organise the conference, it was the
only one in late 2000 to offer to and bail out the WTO at a time
when no country was willing to be the host - after the turmoil in
Seattle in 1999. And while for weeks after September, the rumours
in Geneva were that the conference would be shifted from Doha;
the Qatari officials kept being reassured there no such
possibility.
Complicating the situation is that the Arab countries and many
developing countries - members of the Like-Minded Group at the
WTO - have informally expressed their support to Qatar. They also
have a self-interest in doing so since a logjam and a failure to
hold the ministerial meeting next month means that the current
momentum to launch a new round - to which many of them are
opposed - could later fizzle out.
The WTO officials said that there was no plan for Mr. Mike Moore,
the Director-General, to travel to Doha and plead for Qatar to
drop out. Rubbing salt into the Qatari wound is that the October
18 communique at the APEC meeting in Shanghai called for a new
round to be launched at next month's WTO conference - but made no
mention of where the meet was to take place! And on the same day,
Mr. Robert Zoellick, the U.S. Trade Representative, again raised
security questions about Doha and his EU counterpart, Mr. Pascal
Lamy, speaking in Paris said much the same, even as they insisted
that the ministerial meet had to take place as scheduled. If
Qatar does not give up its right to be the venue, one alternative
that is being speculated is that there will be only a meeting in
Geneva of the WTO's General Council - the administrative and
decision-making body of the WTO where all countries are members -
to discuss routine matters.
Another option is that Qatar, angry about Singapore stepping in
as ``a spare tyre" as a Singapore minister called itself, may
agree to Geneva as the venue for a mini-ministerial. But the
Canton of Geneva will then have to cope with street protests, as
it did in May 1998 during the second ministerial. All in all, a
major mess caused by insensitive actions by the major trade
powers, their allies and senior officials of the WTO Secretariat.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Previous : Volvo's new luxury bus | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|