|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, October 22, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Previous
The primary market eclipse
By C. R. L. Narasimhan
The new issue market has been in the doldrums for so long that it
may disappear for ever from ordinary investors' consciousness.
That is a dangerous development obviously having plenty of
negative implications for savings and capital formation and, of
course, for the capital market itself.
The linkages between the primary (new issue) market and the
secondary market are sometimes exaggerated but this time the
problems of the secondary market are adding to the woes of the
primary market.
The secondary market on which so much hopes have been pinned by
the present Government has been a big let down. Instead of
boosting sentiment as it was expected to in the wake of a widely
applauded budget, the market crashed.
A scam was identified soon and evidently another set of ``scam
prevention measures'' will have to be put in place. A Joint
Parliamentary Committee is at it. The regulators are on their
toes, announcing one liberalisation measure after another but so
far to no avail.
A fortnight ago it was a relaxation in the investment limits for
foreign institutional investors (FIIs).That was followed by an
announcement from the Reserve Bank of India permitting bank
finance to brokers for margin trading.
There is talk of hiking the creeping limits within which existing
company promoters can shore up their stake. Individually, these
measures may be good for the capital market in the long run but
at this juncture they have not done anything to improve
sentiment. The secondary market has been comprehensively
overwhelmed first by the threat of war and thereafter by the
actual war in Afghanisthan.
Looking at the near term horizon, there is little to cheer it up.
Which means that the new issues market will not get even the
faintest of encouragement from the secondary market.
Despondency is complete
How despondent is the primary market? Mr. Prithvi Haldea whose
Prime Database has been tracking the primary market says that the
current phase is the worst ever in its recent history. Consider
the following: In the first six months of the current fiscal,
only two initial public offerings (IPOs) were made to raise Rs.6
crores and even they were more for getting a stock exchange
listing than for mobilising capital.
A comparison with the same period last year, which itself was
considered sluggish, is revealing. At that time, there were 83
IPOs for Rs.1,807 crores. Thirtyfive companies that had secured
Securities and Exchange Board of India approvals to launch their
issues let them lapse rather than venture into an unpredictable
territory.
According to Prime, there are now 43 companies holding SEBI
approvals while another three have filed their applications with
the SEBI. If all of them do not backoff, they should be raising
an aggregate Rs.1,815 crores in the remaining months of the
fiscal year. But the big question is whether they will venture.
Among the companies that are ready with the proposals but still
undecided are: Punjab National Bank (Rs.320 crores), Mahindra
British Telecom (Rs.100 crores), Future Software (Rs.200 crores)
and Godrej Sara Lee (Rs.200 crores).
On the horizon,(though at the beginning stage only) are the mega
issues of Tata Consultancy Services (about Rs.1,000 crores) and
BhartiTeleventures (Rs. 950 crores).
Intermediaries worst hit
The present crisis in the primary market puts paid to hopes and
aspirations of wide sections. The small investors are naturally
disappointed. For many of them, the IPO market was the way to
acquire valuable scrips. The public sector disinvestment
programme had earlier depended on offloading shares through
public issues. Now that the accent has shifted to strategic sale
as a methodology, there is considerably less reliance on the new
issues route.
The bigger damage is on capital formation .With few alternatives
for equity financing through the IPO route, there is no doubt at
all that industrial activity is also suffering. Capital market
intermediaries - the brokers, underwriters, registrars, financial
advertising agencies and share registrars - have all taken big
hits.
Many of them have been driven to oblivion. There is no point even
in wishing for the revival of the old style new issue market.
Is there a solution? Ironic though it is most of the well
intentioned regulatory moves concerning the stock market have had
the effect of marginalising the small investors.
Take for instance book-building. Under this method the bigger
player gets to fix the price of a new issue. Its justification is
better price discovery.
In practice this method, though theoretically available to any
investor big or small, militates against the latter.
In a real sense technology absorption by the capital market has
in the first instance side-stepped the smaller of the investors.
Regulation of course is a key ingredient for protecting investors
and in the current context of reviving their confidence. The SEBI
which in its present phase emphasised investor education more
than any other reform still has plenty more to do.
Investors' disenchantment is another key reason for the collapse
of the primary market. There have been regulatory failures.
Offenders, notably the promoters of the vanishing companies have
not been brought to book and maybe will never be.
However, there is no case at all in not having stringent
regulation and equally important implementing them.
There is muted expectation from the Investor Education and
Protection Fund (IEPF) that was set up two years ago and only now
getting operationalised. The corpus of the fund is made up of
unclaimed dividends, interest, fixed deposits and debentures. One
has to wait a while and see how the IEPF operates towards
mitigating investor grievances.
In developed markets, class action legal suits to counter market
misdemeanour are common. In India, the legal system as a redress
mechanism is out of bounds for most investors.
Investor associations will have a greater role in the new order
but to build up the new issue market to any decent level it is
imperative to tackle investors' disillusionment on a priority
basis.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Previous : Any hopes for the steel industry? | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|