|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, October 22, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Madras Miscellany
The child as a consumer
It was at a forum of Geography teachers a few years ago that I
bemoaned the Indian preoccupation with Science in schools and
colleges and the virtual neglect of the Humanities. I had pointed
out that except for schools in certain educational streams,
History, Geography and Civics were taught in most schools under
the omnibus subject `Social Studies', that even this was taught
for only three years and that I'd known cases where the subject
was even taught by a Mathematics teacher! I had suggested that it
was time to take a new look at the entire subject, particularly
in the light of newly developing environmental, heritage and
consumer concerns, that it was time that we looked at a new
syllabus that would enable the child to take a closer look at its
district one year, its State the next and the country in the
third year, focussing on environmental and heritage concerns. The
subject needed to further look at civic issues and governance in
the fourth year and, in the fifth year, take a look at the rights
and responsibilities of the citizen both as provider and
consumer.
What was suggested was a whole new look at the traditional
subjects of History, Geography and Civics in the light of modern
developments in a changing world, in order to make children not
only aware of the issues facing a deteriorating society but also
of what they could do as they grew up to become caring citizens
with a social (NOT political) commitment to their own district,
State and country.
As I had expected, nothing came of it despite the presence of the
State's Social Studies curriculum adviser, who apparently thought
History, Geography and Civics as taught perfunctorily at present
would make us all better citizens.
I was, therefore, pleased to hear of a couple of organisations,
which in the last year or so having been making efforts to
persuade a few schools to try something different.
INTACH Tamil Nadu is looking at developing a model text, guide-
cum-workbook accompanied by a video that would enable students to
become more conscious of places that are an important part of
their heritage. This material, it was suggested, be used after a
leisurely tour of the heritage site during which brief lectures
would be given at points of particular historical or
architectural interest along the route. A start is planned with
Fort St. George, but if the package produced proves successful in
schools where it will be tried out, then it is proposed to
developed other packages like the Mahratta influence, the Chola
country, Gingee fort, Pulicat, Tranquebar etc. As usual, it is
lack of funds that is holding up the project.
More successful in getting off the mark has been the Centre for
Consumer Education, Research, Teaching, Training and Testing
(Concert), which recently released a workbook for school students
on Consumer Responsibilities and Rights. Written by S. S. Nathan,
Principal, Bala Vidya Mandir, Adyar, it is to be tested out in
about a dozen schools in Class 7 and in another dozen schools in
Class 9. Concert proposes to hold a workshop after the testing to
examine the learning, improve the content from the findings and
then recommend the book to the NCERT for use throughout the
country. Concert's objective in getting the book introduced
nationwide "is to convert irresponsible, unsustainable
consumption leading to neglect of the environment into healthy
consumption by responsible children who will also influence their
parents to follow their example."
The workbook discusses various rights, such as the right to basic
needs, safety, information, choice, redress and healthy
environment. It looks at the rights to redress and consumer
education and, most importantly, at "our responsibilities as
consumers."
It offers questions and exercises and suggests role plays such as
this one: If you find a product you have bought defective, find
the RECEIPT, WRITE down when you bought it and WHAT is wrong,
TAKE it back to the shop (including the packaging), ASK for the
manager, TELL him what is wrong and SHOW him the problem. ASK
politely for a replacement or your money back. If he refuses,
REPEAT YOUR REQUEST (without getting angry) and if he does not
act favourably, tell him you will be making a formal complaint to
a consumer organisation or the relevant Government department.
Then REGISTER YOUR COMPLAINT. The consumer organisation will help
you get a fair deal.
Amusing illustrations by Sri Keshav enhance the book.
* * *
Paranoid about security
Speaking of Fort St. George, I wonder whether the package being
planned by INTACH will prove a worthwhile exercise, considering
the kind of obstructions a visitor runs into at a historic
destination that every tourist brochure recommends the visitor to
wander through.
It happened a couple of weeks ago and it has happened several
times in the past couple of years when visitors have been stopped
with the words `Military area, "``Security,'' ``"Pass?''
On the latest occasion, a VIP and his escorts came out of St.
Mary's Church, took a left and another left and planned to stroll
down the road where there stand Admiralty House where Robert
Clive lived, the Grand Arsenal, Wellesley House now in untended
ruins, and the city's first Town Hall, now the Army's area
headquarters, all heritage buildings.
All they planned to do was to admire the buildings from the road
and hear their stories told.
But it was not to be; "Military area,'' said two unmilitary-
looking persons rather diffidently, till the point was emphasised
by a more military-like presence a few feet later who added,
``Can't look''!
Now, I don't know what secrets there are in the walls of four
historic buildings I've mentioned that need to be kept secure and
defended, but if heritage buildings like these are to be kept out
of the sight of visitors and access to other historic areas are
to be made difficult through the need for passes queued up for,
it's then time to remove Fort St. George from tourist
recommendations and forget the place where the city began.
* * *
When the postman knocked
Randor Guy, who is another who keeps a close track on Madras,
points out that at least one of the persons I had mentioned in
this column on October 8 as not having been remembered in a road
name, has indeed had a road named after him.
Charles Trevelyan, Randor jogged my memory, is recalled in
Trevelyan Basin Street. Indeed it is, in the Elephant Gate area
off Audiappa Naicken Street in West-Central George Town and not
far from Wall Tax Road. The road remembers the Governor (1859-60)
who developed People's Park and had the Basin built to augment
Madras's water supply. That contribution is remembered in a
little noticed fountain in the now abbreviated gardens of
crumbling Victoria Public Hall (the Town Hall).
Trevelyan, who married Macaulay's sister Hannah, was a member of
a redoubtable family that had served India for generations
and written much about the country and its history.
His stay in Madras was rudely cut short because he was considered
guilty of "plain insubordination" when he minuted strong dissent
to a proposal of increased taxation made by the Finance Member,
Government of India. Trevelyan's contention that Madras would not
levy the extra burden saw him being recalled to England.
Curiously, two years later, he was sent to Calcutta, the then
seat of the GOI, as Finance Member! In between, while he was
cooling off in England, he drafted the proposals for the
formation of the Indian Civil Service, the forerunner of the IAS.
His proposal predated the setting up of the civil service in
Britain.
Recalling Trevelyan Basin Street for different reasons is Randor
Guy, who writes:
"As a college student many years ago, I frequented Trevelyan
Basin Street where many of my cricket team-mates lived. It was a
middle-class area and the street was quite broad at one end. We
lads played cricket with a `cover ball' (tennis ball!). The
street was near the famous `Vaikunta Vaadhiyar Street' named
after an orthodox Brahmin who gave you a `visa' to Heaven
(Vaikuntam!) for a modest gift in kind or cash. I wonder if life
in both streets remains the same."
"1950s in Madras! How long ago it all seems now and yet how
radiantly green it remains in my memory!''
S. MUTHIAH
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Voicing their concerns Next : Between You & Me | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|