|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, October 30, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
MagazineNew |
Open PageNew |
EducationNew |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Bush under pressure to intensify campaign
By Sridhar Krishnaswami
WASHINGTON, OCT. 29. The Bush administration is coming under
increasing pressure to expand the scope of the operations in
Afghanistan. A prominent Republican Senator, Mr. John McCain, has
said that Washington should unleash all its might; and that there
was a major difference between the Vietnam War and the present
campaign against terrorism.
``I think what we are going to have to put in is numbers of
forces that are capable of maintaining a base for a period of
time, relatively short, so they can branch out and move into
certain areas where we believe the Taliban and the Al-Qaeda
networks are located'', the Arizona Republican said on Sunday.
Senior Democrats in the Senate and the House of Representatives
have said that should the President commit ground troops, their
support will be readily forthcoming.
The point that senior law makers are making is that air power
alone will not do in the current operations and that the
situation in Afghanistan is vastly different from that in
Yugoslavia where a continuous bombing campaign for 78 days
brought Mr. Slobodan Milosevic to his knees.
``It is going to take a very big effort and probably casualties
will be involved and it won't be accomplished through air power
alone'', Mr. McCain argued. But officials of the Bush
administration are quite guarded when it comes to deploying land
forces. ``Let's not go there yet'', the President's Chief of
Staff, Mr. Andrew Card, maintained. Pentagon officials, civilian
and military, are not saying much on the subject.
One of the criticisms against the current American gameplan is
that the military strikes are not having the kind of muscle they
should and that this was emboldening the Taliban. The perception
is that the administration is somehow holding back from going all
out to attack the Taliban militia and the Al-Qaeda network. ``We
are not holding back at all. We'll do what we have to do to
win'', Mr. Card said.
Law makers on both sides of the political divide are brushing
aside the comparison of Afghanistan to the American involvement
in Vietnam. ``The Vietnam War never had the wholehearted support
of the American people, and in fact as it went on, fewer and
fewer Americans not only didn't support it but actively opposed
it'', Mr. McCain argued, going on to make the point that in the
present instance, Americans have been affected in a dramatic way
and that their patience and support is permanent.
The general impression is that Washington is holding back from
fully backing the forces of the Northern Alliance because a
political alternative to the Taliban is yet to take shape in
spite of hectic efforts. And the big worry is that openly backing
the Northern Alliance would force the ethnic Pashtuns to rally
behind the Taliban, a clearly undesirable proposition.
Further, the U.S. and many in the international community are
well aware of the Northern Alliance's track record of governance
in the post-Soviet phase. This has made the security environment
in the post-Taliban period especially worrisome to many in the
United Nations Security Council.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : New law allows Japan to send troops abroad Next : Straw hints at pause in bombing | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
MagazineNew |
Open PageNew |
EducationNew |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|