|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, November 01, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Magazine New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Strains in U.S.-Saudi Arabia ties
By Kesava Menon
MANAMA (BAHRAIN), OCT. 31. A warning from Saudi Arabia that it
could ask all their citizens to quit the United States if they
continued to be harassed, has come as the latest sign of strain
in the relations between Riyadh and Washington.
The Government-controlled Saudi press has been relentless in its
criticism of the U.S. bombing raids on Afghanistan and there are
other signs that the Kingdom could be pushing its own agenda in
respect of the war-torn country.
The Saudi Interior Minister, Prince Nayef bin Abdelaziz, in
expressing his distress at the harassment that the Kingdom's
nationals and other Arabs are being subjected to by U.S.
officials and private citizens, has said his Government was
working strenuously to put an end to this situation. If, however,
there was no improvement to the treatment that Arabs faced in the
U.S. the Kingdom would ask its citizens to return home or shift
to some other country. There are thousands of Saudi citizens at
any given time in the U.S. who are studying there, looking after
their business and professional interests or merely visiting.
Prince Nayef's statement might not be much more than a warning to
the U.S. that the Kingdom could toughen its stance. But there a
few other stray signs that the Saudis might not continue to be as
acquiescent partners of the U.S. as they were throughout the
1990s. According to reports in the U.S. media, the Kingdom's de
facto ruler, Crown Prince Abdullah, has written to the U.S.
President, Mr. George W. Bush, that there are times when nations,
like people, have to part ways and that the time might have now
arrived for both countries to look after their own interests in
their own ways.
These signs of Saudi estrangement might be attributable in part
to the steady stream of anti-Saudi news stories and analyses
appearing in the Western media, on the basis of information
sourced to Western officials. In general, the Western media has
focussed on the Saudi contribution to the spread of Osamaism
through the export of the Wahabi interpretation of Islam,
financing of mosques where this interpretation is imparted all
over the world and the provision of a large number of recruits to
fundamentalist organisations.
Underlying this pique at what the Kingdom would consider anti-
Saudi propaganda is a harder factor. In slowly consolidating the
idea that Wahabism under-writes extremism in the Muslim world,
the ideologues of the West have posed a challenge to the
ideological underpinnings of the Saudi regime. The Saudi monarchy
came to power and retains it through a symbiotic relationship
with the Wahabi sect and the descendants of the sect's founder,
Sheikh Abdul Wahab (the al Sheikhs), constitute the second most
important clan in the Kingdom.
The Saudi regime's beliefs and baser interests converge on the
issue of Afghanistan. Saudi Arabia has invested a lot over two
decades, in terms of money and political effort, in trying to
ensure a hard-line Sunni dominance in Afghanistan. This policy
appeared to have blown up in the face of the Saudis when the
Sept. 11 terror attacks took place.
An Arab League and an OIC meeting that took place soon after were
devoted to the effort to ensure that causes dear to the Arab
heart - Palestine especially - did not suffer collateral damage
from the newly launched U.S. war on terrorism. The problems of
Afghanistan and Pakistan were largely ignored at these meetings.
Since then, the Saudis appear to have taken a second breath
perhaps emboldened by the manner in which Pakistan has been able
to insert the idea of ``a moderate Taliban'' into the U.S.
thinking. The Saudis now apparently feel, especially after the
Foreign Minister, Prince Saudi Al Faisal's visit to Islamabad,
that the stakes they have invested in Afghanistan are not totally
irretrievable. In order to have their own input in Afghan
affairs, the Saudis have to mark out a difference from the U.S.
while reaffirming their links with Pakistan.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : West asked to define terrorism Next : Bush attends world series despite new threats | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Magazine New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|