|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, November 17, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Magazine New |
Metro Plus New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Book Review New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Previous
| Next
Same old story for India
Once again the Indians missed out on a superb chance to seize the
initiative. This time, due to faulty team selection.
On a green, seaming wicket, and under overcast conditions, not to
forget the wind factor, the Indians actually went into the
crucial second Test with just two pacemen!
It was absurd really, and defeated the very purpose of putting
the opposition in. The result was that the South Africans, who
lost the experienced Gary Kirsten early on, managed to wriggle
out of a potentially threatening situation before the Indians
struck back somewhat in the last session.
These days, there appears to be no clarity of thought in the
decisions of the Indian think-tank, no clear strategy. Visible in
its methods is a streak of negative thinking.
In cricket, or for that matter any sport, it becomes necessary to
take calculated risks, and dropping senior leggie Anil Kumble
from the eleven would have been the right move.
The Indians often talk about the `horses for courses' policy, but
seldom practise it. Kumble is the highest wicket- taker in the
side, and his contribution to Indian cricket is immense, yet he
doesn't quite fit into the scheme of things for this particular
match.
The need of the hour was courage on the part of the team-
management. But it clearly left everyone disappointed.
Javagal Srinath operated quite beautifully early on, bowling the
right length and direction, but the lack of a third paceman meant
the Indians could not keep the pressure on.
When Kumble was introduced, the South Africans played him like a
medium paced inswing bowler, and Venkatesh Prasad was sorely
missed. This brings us to another baffling question.
Why pick Prasad at all in the team, if the team- management
doesn't have the confidence to play him in these conditions?
Indeed, the Karnataka paceman has received a raw deal on this
South African campaign.
He was the highest wicket-taker in Tests for India during the
tour of Sri Lanka this year, yet in conditions that should suit
his kind of bowling more, he finds himself ignored.
Prasad, a genuine seam bowler with the ability to move the ball
more than any of the other Indian pacemen, would have
complemented Srinath well for sure. Instead, he watched the
proceedings from the dressing room.
Kumble disappointed, but Harbhajan, less dependent on the
conditions, did make his presence felt, even putting a quality
player like Kallis in two minds. The Sardar has added teeth to
the Indian attack.
Finally to opener Gibbs' strokeful hundred. He is indeed on a
roll these days, and his attacking methods have left the Indians
rattled.
It has been noticed over the years, that when the Indian bowlers
run into a batsman who adopts aggressive tactics, they run out of
ideas.
However, all credit to Gibbs for a brilliant effort that could
have significant bearing on this Test.
By K. SRIKKANTH
www.krishsrikkanth.com
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Previous : Gibbs does it again for the Proteas Next : Lanka has the advantage | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Magazine New |
Metro Plus New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Book Review New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|