|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, November 24, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Magazine New |
Metro Plus New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Book Review New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Irrigation scam: Retd. AG's help sought to frame charges
By S. Rajendran
BANGALORE, NOV. 23. The State Government has sought the services
of a retired Accountant-General to help frame charges against the
accused in a major scam in the Irrigation Department involving a
sum anywhere between Rs. 5 crore and Rs. 50 crore.
Sources in the Government told The Hindu here on Friday that
although the efforts were not aimed at pinning down any
particular politician or a political party, the Government would
not hesitate to take action if sufficient evidence was available.
``As of now, we have listed the names which have figured in the
records. At present, there is no name of any politician. However,
should there be any evidence, we will not hesitate to take
action.''
The State Government, especially the Minister for Water
Resources, Mr. H.K. Patil, had sought a special audit of certain
works pertaining to the two major irrigation projects -- the
Upper Krishna Project (UKP) and the Upper Tunga Project (UTP).
The Government which gathered sufficient evidence after a cursory
look at the records, requested the Comptroller and Auditor-
General (CAG) of India to go into the works pertaining to the
Indi Branch Canal of the UKP and the main canal of the UTP in
September last year. After a detailed study of the accounts, the
CAG recently submitted its report to the Government.
Shocked by the revelations in the CAG report, a high-level
meeting was held on Friday to discuss the steps to be taken to
recover the excess payments, apart from ways of launching civil
and criminal proceedings against the officials concerned and the
agency which executed the works. Although it would take time to
launch the proceedings, it was said the State Government was keen
on dealing with the matter with a firm hand in an effort to
prevent such a major loss to the State exchequer in future.
Sources in the Major Irrigation Department said that of the
nearly Rs. 350 crore involved in the execution of the two
projects, the Government was shocked over the ``erroneous
payment'' of Rs. 5.59 crore as made out in the CAG report. ``In
such a major project, erroneous payments are bound to be there.
But never in the history of the department have we seen such a
massive amount involved. This money has to be recovered, and can
be recovered. The erroneous payment should not have crossed an
upper limit of Rs. 25 lakh to Rs. 35 lakh, which roughly works
out to 1 per cent of the total cost. And the erroneous payment in
question here pertains to only the UKP.''
The Indi Branch Canal work pertaining to two distributaries (nos.
11 and 13) were originally estimated to cost Rs. 58 crore,
although the work was put to tender for Rs. 76 crore in 1992. The
work was subsequently awarded to an agency for Rs. 102 crore with
the condition that it should be completed in four years. The
agency never commenced the work, and at the end of the deadline,
requested an extension, and a subsequent extension. Instead of
cancelling the contract and awarding the tender afresh, the then
Government reportedly gave a bonanza to the agency concerned
resulting in the cost of the project shooting up to Rs. 234
crore.
The State Government has also taken serious note of the
Irrigation Department officials disobeying the directions of the
then Chief Secretary. The Chief Secretary, on noticing the huge
payments without the permission of the Government, had ordered
that further payments to the construction agency should be only
with the concurrence of the Government. ``However, despite all
the directions, money was drawn and 99.99 per cent of the
payments to the agency was completed. As per government rules,
amounts of over 15 per cent of the tendered amount should be paid
only after the permission of the Government is obtained. In the
present instance, 60 per cent of the amount was paid even before
the Chief Secretary could issue directions. This in itself should
speak volumes of the extraordinary interest of those involved in
the scam.''
On the scam in the Upper Tunga Project, the Government was
confident that the excess payments made could either be recovered
or adjusted since the work on the project was still in progress.
Although 11 officials have been identified and suspended so far,
there could be many others to follow. There were those who did
not even care for the resolutions passed at the board meeting of
the Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigam Ltd. (KBJNL) where it was resolved
that payments relating to the project should be suspended. Hence,
it was obvious that there were many senior personnel of the
Irrigation Department in the technical, administrative and
accounts wings who were involved in the scam.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : 'Mysore IT.com should have own character' Next : 11 Irrigation Dept. officials suspended | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Magazine New |
Metro Plus New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Book Review New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|