|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, November 25, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Magazine New |
Metro Plus New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Book Review New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
MPs divided over changes in RS election law
By Our Legal Correspondent
NEW DELHI, NOV. 24. Divergent views were expressed by Members of
Parliament on the proposed changes contemplated by the Government
in the laws on Rajya Sabha elections. At a seminar here some felt
that such changes would impinge on the country's federal
character, others were of the view that these changes would help
remove corruption and bring about transparency in the voting by
members.
Recently, the Government announced its intention to amend
Sections 3 (requiring a person to be a voter of a particular
State for being elected to the Rajya Sabha) and 128 (provides for
secret ballot in voting) of the Representation of the People Act
to enable anyone from contesting from any State and providing for
open ballot in the voting.
Mr. R.K. Anand, the Congress MP, felt that secret ballot was the
best form of voting as it ensured free and fair elections. He
questioned the bona fides of the Government in bringing these
changes in the garb of putting an end to corruption in voting in
Rajya Sabha elections.
Mr. Sitaram Yechury, CPI(M) politburo member, said the concept of
secret ballot was against the spirit of democracy. When there was
secret voting right from the election of panchayat president to
the President of the country, there was no need to introduce the
open ballot system for the Rajya Sabha elections alone.
If a person was elected from any State, this would go against the
concept of federal structure as the rationale behind the
criterion that one should be a voter in a particular State was to
give a fair representation to that State. If that condition was
removed, it would be against the interest of that State, he said.
Mr. M.M. Agarwal, MP, said the proposed changes were ill-
motivated. Secret ballot was the essence of democratic elections
and once open ballot was introduced it would take away free and
fair elections and give room for intimidation and coercion at the
time of voting.
On the other hand, Mr. T.N. Chaturvedi, BJP MP, justified the
need for bringing in changes in the law which, he said, were
intended to remove corruption during voting. For the last 25
years suggestions were being made to change the criterion for
being elected from a particular State, and the proposed changes
would not in any way violate democratic principles.
Mr. Vineet Narain, Editor, Kal Chakra and Dr. Vinod Sethi,
secretary-general of Capital Foundation Society, which had
organised the seminar also spoke.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Poll reforms high on Govt.'s agenda, says Advani Next : Consultations begin on India's role in Afghan reconstruction | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Magazine New |
Metro Plus New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Book Review New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|