|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, November 25, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Magazine New |
Metro Plus New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Book Review New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
IUML to play down Aryadan issue
By Girish Menon
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, NOV. 24. After a round of sparring with the
Congress MLA, Mr. Aryadan Mohammed, over his remarks about its
supremo, Mr. Panakkad Syeed Mohammedali Sihab Thangal, the IUML
has decided to play down the current row and make an attempt to
contain it to the local level.
Mr. Aryadan Mohammed had sought to give a new turn to his
running battle with the IUML leadership which took off this time
over the open support given to a NRI businessman, Mr. P.V. Abdul
Wahab, in the labour dispute in his residential public school in
Nilambur. At the level of a labour dispute, Mr. Aryadan Mohammed
made it clear at a press conference that as a trade union leader,
he would never support any anti-labour action taken by
managements and accused a section of the IUML leadership of
misleading Mr. Thangal in furtherance of their narrow business
interests.
At a political level, Mr. Aryadan Mohammed subtly tried to shift
focus of the running controversy with the League into the realms
of a public debate on whether Mr. Thangal, revered as a spiritual
leader by large sections of the Muslim Community in Malabar and
elsewhere, was above criticism as the State president of the IUML
and whether it was correct to mix religion and politics.
The responses of the senior Congress leaders such as Mr. K.
Karunakaran and Mr. A.K. Antony have been lukewarm, if not cold.
They have indicated in as many words their disinclination to
overplay the issue, which had the potential of disrupting their
respective equations with the IUML and Mr. Thangal. Mr. Antony
termed the entire Nilambur issue as a local issue, while Mr.
Karunakaran Merely attributed it to the traditional fight Mr.
Aryadan Mohammed had been involved with the IUML leadership in
Malappuram.
These leaders would find it hard to disown Mr. Aryadan Mohammed
in his fight with the IUML because it relates to the Congress
party's national position on secularism, which is totally against
mixing religion with politics. It is the very plank on which the
Congress' opposition (or for that matter the IUML's too) to the
BJP is built on.
Besides, the issue was proving to be a disrupting element in his
cozy relationship with the IUML. It is in this context that Mr.
Antony, who was initially worried about the tone and tenor of the
controversy, took the conscious decision to underplay Mr. Aryadan
Mohammed's statements. As far as the Nilambur MLA is concerned,
he believes that his positions would help him shore up his anti-
IUML base in the district. The lukewarm attitude of the Chief
Minister and other Congress leaders has not been comforting for a
leader like him, who has reaped his political harvest through
prominent anti-IUML postures. This is why Mr. Aryadan Mohammed
has reacted the way he did, though in the process he took care to
reiterate that he had indeed not criticised Mr. Thangal.
The IUML's initial moves were aimed at strengthening its hold in
Malappuram district and expanding its penumbra of influence to
areas like Nilambur which has been traditionally outside its
fold. But with the controversy taking a new turn, the IUML
leadership woke up to the danger of getting involved in a debate
that would be more damaging to its interests.
The party leaders have been passionately protecting its supremo
from any kind of controversy which might expose him to petty
politicking. Mr. Thangal's contributions towards keeping the
Muslim community on the path of moderation cannot not be
underscored. The spiritual position and political office he holds
have worked well in strengthening the IUML's base, besides
keeping fundamentalist elements under check. It apparently does
not want to drag Mr. Thangal into the kind of controversy that
Mr. Arayadan Mohammed is raring to. In addition, the party
dislikes the kind of debate Mr. Aryadan Mohammed wants because it
fears it might weaken its hard political positions against the
BJP.
In this context, the IUML leadership, after careful
deliberations, decided that none of its senior leaders should
react to Mr. Arayadan Mohammed's statements and try at limiting
the issue to the local level.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Munna murder case: ex-MLA's brother held Next : Publication of draft electoral rolls on Dec. 10 | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Magazine New |
Metro Plus New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Book Review New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|