|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, November 26, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Magazine New |
Metro Plus New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Book Review New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Previous
| Next
The L&T prize: the environment is different
The sell-off by Reliance of its stake in L&T does not have the
same emotional overtones as their original acquisition did. But
the first transaction and the controversy surrounding it were a
reflection of the environment of more than a decade ago.
By C. R. L. Narasimhan
On Sunday last (November 18), Grasim Industries of the AV Birla
Group announced its acquisition of a little over 10 per cent
stake of Larsen & Toubro (L&T) from Reliance Industries for a
consideration of Rs. 766.50 crores. The suddenness of the
announcement certainly made it newsworthy but there were other
weightier issues behind that bland announcement. L&T, a much
admired engineering company, is ``professionally managed,'' in
the sense that there are no promoter groups running it. The
financial institutions have been its major stakeholders, now
holding around 24 per cent of its equity. So, whenever a sizable
chunk of its non-institutional share holding changes hands, it is
bound to create extraordinary interest. More so because of the
profiles of the vendor and the buyer.
Reliance Industries and the AV Birla group, among the best known
Indian business groups, have not shied away from the
opportunities presented by the new business environment. Compared
to just a decade ago, a company can expand through acquisitions
or reduce in size by hiving off a division using the stock market
route. Today, there are far greater opportunities for mergers and
acquisitions, whether through friendly negotiations or hostile
bids. A takeover code is in place. Share buybacks are now in the
statute books. Reliance Industries has been one of the most
prominent users of the buy-back route. The Aditya Birla group
paid a hefty sum for buying certain well known brands of ready
made garments from Madura Coates. Numerous other examples
involving either of these groups or other companies can be cited.
There can be no doubt at all that the Indian corporate scene has
started resembling its counterpart in the West.
Different scenario, different yardsticks
The last point is relevant because when Reliance acquired not
only the stake but tried to wrest control of L&T 12 years ago,
the environment was vastly different. (Some would say that
Reliance itself was a vastly different entity at that time).
Political battles were fought and ultimately the Ambanis had to
give up on their attempt to control L&T.
The raging controversy of 1988 and the years following involved
the role played by BOB Fiscal Services, a merchant banking
subsidiary of the public sector Bank of Baroda. It allegedly
acted as a conduit for the bulk transfer of L&T shares owned by
the Life Insurance Corporation of India and the Unit Trust of
India to be transferred to Reliance. BOB Fiscal was eventually
ordered to be shut down. A decade and more after Reliance
acquired those shares in a blaze of controversy has seen the
maturing of the market.
For instance, no one is saying that the most recent transfer of
the L&T shares is unethical. The business environment of today
seems capable of accommodating the news of such large
acquisitions/divestments without getting worked up. Certainly the
sell-off by Reliance today has not had the same emotional
overtones as its original purchase did. The control over L&T by
another Indian business group - a possibility not ruled out for
the foreseeable future by the Grasim spokesman - has not led to
any feverish lobbying by politicians and other groups to block
the sale. Reliance did not have a say in the day-to-day
management of L&T even though all these years they held on to
their stake.
The fact that the current interest on the transaction is centred
on technical issues is further proof of the transformation of the
market sentiment. Today, the short-term focus has been on the
price paid. At Rs. 306.60 per share, it represents a 47 per cent
premium over the last traded price of L&T. Other related issues
here are the control of L&T over the long term.
While with a 10 per cent stake, Grasim gets into the driver's
seat, will it step up its investments in L&T over the next few
years and take it around but just below the 15 per cent mark? The
numbers become important because under the Securities and
Exchange Board of India (SEBI) rules an acquirer has to make an
open offer it its stake goes beyond 15 per cent. In that
connection the analogy of Gujerat Ambuja's acquisition of a 14.4
per cent stake in ACC has been cited. With the SEBI ruling that
the acquirer need not make an open offer, the two companies are
in a strategic alliance. ACC, like L&T, has a widely dispersed
shareholding. With a large block of shares Gujerat Ambuja can
effectively influence ACC.
How about control?
Will Grasim follow the same route is of much topical interest,
also because like in the earlier transaction, the Grasim deal
also has plenty to do with the fortunes of the cement industry.
L&T, best known for its engineering and construction strengths,
has branched off into cement and information technology areas. In
cement, it has a capacity of 16 million tonnes and recently has
been thinking of getting out of it by demerging the cement
division and finding a strategic partner/investor.
The names of some prominent international cement majors were
doing the rounds. Naturally, there are question marks over the
future course of the demerger. After all, L&T now has a large
investor with substantial interests in cement already. If the
strategic alliance between Grasim and L&T holds, the former will
have access to nearly 27 million tonnes of cement. The other side
of the story, of course, is that the foreign cement majors have
effectively been pipped at the post as it were. They will be
unable to get a significant foothold in the domestic cement
industry through future cement acquisitions.
Nearly all the interest on the transaction has to do with cement
at this stage. It seems likely that Grasim paid a premium mainly
because of cement. How Grasim uses its newly acquired strengths,
the corporate restructuring it will adopt for its existing
business will be keenly watched. There has not been much
speculation as to what the financial institutions will do or how
the transfer of a chunk of equity in L&T will affect their
fortunes.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Previous : Citigroup launches OrbiTech Next : Organon raises stake in Infar India | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Magazine New |
Metro Plus New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Book Review New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|