|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, November 27, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Magazine New |
Metro Plus New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Book Review New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
A diabolic move, says CPI(M)
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, NOV. 26. The Government came in for strong criticism
in the Lok Sabha today for what the Opposition called
``Talibanisation'' of the education system, referring to the
recent NCERT circular deleting certain ``objectionable'' portions
in school history textbooks.
The opposition benches protested the deletion and alleged that it
was done at the behest of the Sangh Parivar. Raising the issue,
the CPI(M) member, Mr. Suresh Kurup, said
the textbooks had been altered at the instance of the Sangh
Parivar. He was supported by the members of the Congress, the
Left parties, the Samajwadi Party and the Rashtriya Janata Dal.
Mr. Mulayam Singh Yadav of the SP said the BJP was doing what the
Taliban was doing in Afghanistan.
Mr. Somnath Chatterjee of the CPI(M) said the move was
``diabolical'' and a deliberate attempt at tampering with
history. ``This is amazing, you cannot impose it like this on the
children... it shows a particular state of mind. They are
obscurantist and fundamentalist people,'' he said, pointing to
the ruling party benches. He also criticised the Prime Minister,
Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee, for supporting the move to ``change''
history.
The NCERT circular was defended by the BJP members, Mr. Vijay
Kumar Malhotra and Mr. Sahib Singh Verma, who said ``wrong
teaching'' should not be imparted to the school children. Mr.
Malhotra said the portions that had been deleted were highly
derogatory to the Sikh Guru, Tegh Bahadur, the Jat community, the
Aryans and the Jain community.
Though the Congress Deputy Leader, Mr. Shivraj Patil, did not
criticise the deletion of the derogatory references and
objectionable portions, he protested the way in which it had been
done. ``There should be a proper system of doing it. It should
not aim at dividing the society.'' Recalling the controversy in
Rajasthan over the removal of certain objectionable portions in
textbooks, he said ``when the Congress came to power in
Rajasthan, it set up a committee and on the basis of the report,
ordered the removal of such portions.''
The former Prime Minister, Mr. Chandra Shekhar, felt that school
children should not be taught what should be studied by research
scholars. The Trinamool Congress leader, Ms. Mamata Banerjee,
objected to the use of the word ``Taliban'' in the House and
wanted the Education Minister to clarify the current controversy.
Later, addressing a press conference, Mr. Malhotra criticised the
Congress walkout from the Lok Sabha over the issue, saying the
party was trying to come close to the SP because of the coming
Uttar Pradesh Assembly polls. Expressing ``surprise'' over the
walkout, Mr. Malhotra said it smacked of double standards as it
was the Congress Government in Delhi which had unanimously
recommended the deletion of certain portions referring to Guru
Tegh Bahadur.
The Congress spokesman, Mr. Anand Sharma, had a hard time trying
to make amends for the stand taken by Mr. Patil in the Lok Sabha.
What Mr. Patil meant was if a deletion had to be made, it should
be done by an independent committee of historians and not by the
Government, Mr. Sharma said.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Thailand for greater security cooperation with India Next : PM urges armed forces to frame dynamic policy | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Magazine New |
Metro Plus New |
Open Page New |
Education New |
Book Review New |
Business New |
SciTech New |
Entertainment New |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|