|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, November 28, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Magazine |
Metro Plus |
Open Page |
Education |
Book Review |
Business |
SciTech |
Entertainment |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home |
|
Other States
| Previous
| Next
New theory on Harappans
By Lalit K. Jha
NEW DELHI, NOV. 27.
A retired archaeologist from Aligarh Muslim University, in a
study sponsored by Indian Council for Historical Research, has
propounded the theory that the inhabitants of the Harappan
civilisation were Aryans and not Dravidians.
The revealing study by Prof. M.D.N. Sahi, which has brought sharp
reaction from established archaeologists and ancient Indian
historians, states that the root of the Harappan civilisation lay
in the region between the Ganga and the Saraswati -- the
Brahmarishidesh. By doing so he has questioned the existing
proposition that the Harappan culture had its genesis near the
Indus Valley.
Basing his analysis on excavations he carried out at various
sites particularly in the Gangetic valley of Uttar Pradesh, Prof.
Sahi claims that it was from this region that the earlier
inhabitants of the Harappan civilisation moved westward towards
Indus Valley, where the mature stage of the civilisation emerged.
``It is normally believed that the Kot Diji culture (a place near
the historic Mohenjodaro on Indus river in South Pakistan) gave
rise to the mature Harappan culture and is termed as Early
Harappan. But, this is not so. It had the least role to play in
the growth of the Harappan culture, rather it was not conducive
to its growth,'' Prof. Sahi told The Hindu.
Prof. Sahi was in Delhi on his way to Aligarh from Vadodara,
where he read his paper ``The Genesis of Harappan Civilisation''
at the Joint Annual Conference of IAS, ISPQS and IHCS, concluded
on November 24.
``The study reveals that Gangetic basin OCP (Ochre Coloured
Pottery) culture, in fact, represented the Early Harappan period.
This is further confirmed by the fact that the graffiti marks on
the potteries of sites of this area bore the characters of
Harappan script,'' he said, adding: ``The script was also
associated with this culture from the initial stage.''
Prof. Sahi said in the early stages, there existed two streams of
culture in the region -- the Kot Diji culture and the one between
Ganga and Saraswati, which was real Harappan in its infancy.
``This culture then spread westward and amalgamated and
assimilated the Kot Diji culture. At times they even conquered
Kot Diji people. This is reflected in the pottery remains,'' he
said.
The mature Harappan civilisation, he said, grew through a natural
organic evolutionary process represented by four stages --
infancy (3,500 BC to 3,100 BC), adolescence (3,100-2,700 BC)
adulthood (2,700-2,500 BC) and mature urban phases (2,500-1,900
BC). ``With this all doubts about the genesis and evolution of
the Harappan civilisation is now cleared,'' Prof. Sahi said.
Prof. Sahi, who has two theories to his credit -- use of iron in
India started from the 16th Century BC and that there was no gap
between the urbanisation of Harappan and Buddhist period --
claimed that literary and archaeological evidences indicated that
Harappans were the early Aryans, having their ``indigenous
origin'' in the region between the Sarasvati and the Ganga in the
first half of the fourth millennium BC.
As regards the popularly believed theory that the Aryans came
from outside and conquered the Dravidians and people of the
Harappan civilisation, Prof. Sahi said: ``The dichotomy of Aryans
and Dravidians is not justified. Both co-existed during the same
period but in different regions. The Dravidians were not driven
out by the Aryans.''
However, historians and archaeologists differ with the
proposition of Prof. Sahi. Referring to the study which is funded
by the ICHR, well-known ancient Indian historian from the
University of Delhi, Prof. D.N. Jha, alleged: ``This is only part
of a larger game plan of the fascist organisations like the RSS
to prove that the Aryans were the original inhabitants of India
and never came from outside.''
Asserting that the material culture of the Rig Vedic period and
Harappan culture were completely different, Prof. Jha asked:
``Where is the evidence of what Mr. Sahi has said at the Vadodara
conference?''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Other States Previous : BJP dharna for Minister's sacking Next : Talk of the Town | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Magazine |
Metro Plus |
Open Page |
Education |
Book Review |
Business |
SciTech |
Entertainment |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Obituary |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|