![]() Thursday, Mar 28, 2002 |
| Opinion | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
Sir, I agree with the opinion expressed in ``POTO ratification will be a setback to civil liberties'' (March 25). In the recent ruling in the Gurmail Singh case, a Division Bench of the Supreme Court held that TADA was a ``drastic piece of legislation'' and a ``serious in-road in the liberty of an individual''. What is POTO but a dressed-up TADA? Also there is no need for the Government to misuse POTO as it accused the Congress of doing with TADA. A mere application of the legislation is in itself a ``serious in-road in the liberty of an individual''. Arming police with more powers than they currently wield as POTO envisages is a dangerous move. Do the police in any part of the country have a track record of partisan-free and just behaviour?
D. Pramod,
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2002, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|