![]() Monday, May 06, 2002 |
| Opinion | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
Sir, The clarifications given by Robert D. Blackwill on the new U. S. visa regulations (May 3) are greatly heartening. Yet they are inadequate. The Ambassador assures the non-immigrant visitors that at the port of entry they will normally be granted admission for a stay of more than 30 days for the mere asking. The new regulations do not read that simple. They place the burden on the entrants to prove the necessity for a longer period. If convinced, the INS inspector at the port of entry may possibly approve a longer stay. The inspectors at most airports can hardly spend more than a minute per entrant in view of the influx of incessant flights. They do not have enough time to deliberate and determine what is a fair and reasonable period of stay. Case-by-case adjudication is impossible. The consequence will be that the entrants will receive a routine approval of only a month's stay. This logistic difficulty is not easy to get over. The misgivings at the start, the ordeal at the port of entry and the anxieties of an ill-planned tour will make the visitor's plight miserable.
L. Rajaraman,
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2002, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|