![]() Wednesday, May 22, 2002 |
| Front Page | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Front Page
By Atul Aneja and Sandeep Dikshit
With the combat readiness almost complete, the armed forces are anticipating political signals, especially after the assassination of the Hurriyat leader, Abdul Gani Lone this evening. Official sources here said that Mr. Lone's killing was part of a concerted move to disrupt the Jammu and Kashmir elections through enhanced infiltrations. Sources in the security establishment however felt that the killing of Mr. Lone could backfire on its perpetrators as it could harden Kashmiri sentiments against cross-border terrorism. Meanwhile, the internal debate in the Government on the non-military options available to convey its concerns against cross-border terrorism also began to acquire greater momentum. Highly-placed sources said the debate is hovering over the possibility of withdrawing the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) status to Pakistan, the abrogation of the Indus Waters treaty and the possible enforcement of provisions of the U.N. Security Council resolution 1373 in the backdrop of the Jammu incident. Resolutions 1373 calls upon all countries to terminate terrorism on their soil and lead to enforcement of sanctions in case of non-compliance. According to one view, the withdrawal of the MFN status could be counter-productive. For instance, India, it is said, has been maintaining that Pakistan should be debarred from entering a newly-formed grouping of Indian Ocean Rim countries as it has denied MFN status to India. The denial of MFN status to Pakistan, on the contrary, can be an about-turn, that can embarrass India in the multilateral fora. On the Indus waters treaty, it is felt that the blocking of waters of key tributaries of the Indus that flow into Pakistan have several pitfalls. Such a step can be construed as a violation of international law. Focused on bilateralism, India may find it hard to directly invoke U.N. Securty Council resolution 1373 in the light of the Jammu terrorist attack. But sources here point out that the Securty Council can suo motu discuss Pakistan's adherence to this resolution.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2002, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|