![]() Thursday, May 23, 2002 |
| Southern States | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Southern States
-
Kerala
By Our Special Correspondent
The State Steering Committee of the party, the third largest in the ruling coalition, however, was cautious in its reactions to the issue. The party, however, gave a clear signal that it would politically face the attempts to isolate it and its leader, the Revenue Minister, K M Mani, on the encroachment issue. As part of this move, it decided to extend the dates of the public contact programme currently under way and hold rallies in other districts as well. The double standards adopted by the Government on the encroachments in Mathikettan and Pooyamkutty figured in the meeting. Some of the party leaders strongly objected to the silence of the Chief Minister on the Pooyamkutty encroachment, which has now been established. Speakers felt that there were concerted efforts from some quarters to isolate Mr.Mani and the KC(M). It would be recalled that the Chief Minister had said that the Pooyamkutty encroachment had not come to his notice, while the Forest Minister, K. Sudhakaran, has been maintaining that no encroachment had taken place in the area. However, the Revenue Minister, K. M. Mani, did not want to press the issue as the Pooyamkutty encroachment was connected to another department. As a coalition partner, it was not the KC(M)'s policy to express an opinion on issues relating to another coalition partner, he said at the meeting. Later, the party leaders also made it clear that there was no attempt to indict the Chief Minister on the issue. The statement released by the KC(M) general secretary, Joy Abraham, after the meeting also reflected the cautious line. In a resolution, the steering committee, while congratulating Mr. Mani for his creative and transparent steps on the Mathikettan encroachment, said his actions had gone a long way in refurbishing the image of the UDF and the Government. The resolution wanted the State Government to take strong action against all encroachments on Government land as a social crime and suppress them at any cost. It also patted the Government for its special packages for the weaker sections and farmers. Despite the sugarcoated statement, the KC(M) leaders could hardly conceal the fact that their relations in the UDF were strained. The only difference is that they were keen in not dragging the Chief Minister into the vortex of a controversy.
Send this article to Friends by
E-Mail
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2002, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|