Opinion - Letters to the Editor

Animal research

Sir, — The claim (Thakur joins issue with Maneka, May 22) that the National Institute of Virology's work is hampered by CPCSEA guidelines is meaningless since every citizen should respect the law. Scientists should follow the guidelines while undertaking experiments. It is unethical to experiment on sentient and unconsenting creatures when others enjoy the expected benefits! A recent issue of New Scientist clearly mentioned that if the monkeys are kept under stress, the results one get may be doubtful. The knowledge workers like scientists are egoistic and they resist change. Many established laboratories have animal houses and scientists find it easy to use a ready-made system instead of going in for alternatives. Often, scientists rely on disgruntled animal house staff who have scant regard for animals. Scientists should have a re-look and go in for non-animal research methodologies.

Dr. K.S. Manja,
Mysore

Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Opinion

News: Front Page | National | Southern States | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary |

Stories in this Section

• Disquieting incidents
• The water of life
• Politics as violence
• Investigation as collusion — II
• A blunt message to Pak.
• A chance to secure our future
• Hoping for peace
• Fight terrorism
• Need for sanctions
• Dangerous portents
• Cultural osmosis
• Muslim-Dalit ties
• Animal research

Copyright © 2002, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu